Ah nice work, I don't get up there to survey often enough

Nice work! I should probably expand the coverage of Glenelg down south till it meets up with your work

I don't see much GPS activity for way/323574984 ; do you know if its accurate? Do you have any more information on the construction?

Its a bit hard to make sense of way/247800173 - improve-osm suggests one set of GPS traces, strava heatmap another; neither are quite how its traced at the moment.

http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Mapbox&id=w247800173&map=17.06/174.05481/-41.60812

http://improveosm.org/#background=Bing&map=13.34/-41.6027/174.0730

Could you take another look and see what's the most accurate?

I updated a few roads like way/286706063 which seemed to have completed construction - do you know if the speed limit of 15km/h is still valid? Did you want to trace the other nearby areas just to the north as well?

Do you know if the road works have started or similar? There's no GPS traces via http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&id=w194715172&map=18.38/-0.55229/51.90851 yet, so I'm assuming its very early days

http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&map=17.64/-0.65949/51.99354 shows a bit of a different story with way/46910762 - are you able to take a look with your knowledge of things on the ground and decide if that bridleway is right; or the gps trace a bit over from it ?

Hey, just wanted to say nice work with the house mapping around here!

We use mapbox streets at work as a property industry company - http://imgur.com/a/CpPTU is what it looks like in our system.

The stuff on the left, blurred, are recent sales along Danks street, which includes things like Land Area from private suppliers.

What we don't have (but could get because of your contributions) is approximate building area.

One thing you might be interested in asking your local council about is if they have "building footprint data" - check out the City of Geelong, where they flew around and did LIDAR measurements.

If they have it and publish it via data.gov.au; importing isn't too tricky.

Keep it up with the building mapping :)

Track can be a good compromise in that case.

http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&map=18.15/-0.11229/50.98508 shows a bit better layout of some of the roads which you might be interested in

I think this might have misaligned node/1684996913

Do you happen to know the surface of way/243064597 ? From a strava user note: there is a route but it is not a official road more like a farm track and unsuitable for road bikes

Is this cycleway better modelled as part of the footpath, with bicycle=yes?

http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&id=w362607270&map=19.54/-0.97000/37.59444

Do you know if the bridge (see note/771693) is actually there still?

Do you know if way/60703903 is a private road at all?

A strava user reports: "Camino privado cerrado"

Ah, thanks for adding Herron Todd White :) We're more of a valuation company though!

Hi, you might know if note/762754 is resolvable or accurate

Do you know if the intersection at node/614616601 is accurate? Imagery suggests something different to what is mapped.

Strava users report: "it will always send me up this road against traffic. I must deviate around it one block and then cut over.", which I think refers to that intersection.

Do you happen to know what the condition of way/46707418 is on the ground?

Strava users report a problem, and the heatmap suggests the imagery is out of date ... but you've mapped accurately to aerial imagery.

http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&map=17.00/-2.97817/51.57670