Is way/401616172 still under construction?

Is this finished construction? way/286594384 ? Still tagged as construction / can't tell from bing

Is this area still under construction (way/50845458 specifically)

Are The Clifford Apartments still under construction?

Is way/107948769 still under construction? Bing suggests no

Was way/159018215 ever built?

Do you know if way/291616515 has finished construction?

way/123184536 - is construction finished on this? It shows at least a footpath on bing imagery

Ah neat, she (Sarnya) used to be my landlord.

way/188426204 - that should probably be completed by now, safe to mark it as no longer under construction?

There's a few weird polylines; like way/119575757 which were added here. It looks like some kind of import, but lacks correct tags / some of the buildings are way off from imagery. Can you take a look at this and clean it up?

So with tracing places like this; you don't need to add both an area and an individual node with the same information - the area tracing will set the right name and other details.

You might be interested in tracing the car parking and building itself separately - right now this is tagged as one big funny shaped building, but it's more accurate to call describe this as a place of worship with an actual building in it (and parking, driveways, etc)

I'm guessing from strava user reports this (way/247960495) is now built?

Nice work! I spent a bit of time with a list of Canberra schools (via the JOSM opendata plugin and data.gov.au); adding buildings, tennis courts, etc and a lot more detail.

I wonder if there's a similar list for SA schools we could use to find other likely sporting grounds

Why is Grand Tunnel du Chambon marked as access=no ? way/384864359

Rosedale drive doesn't match imagery etc at all - does it exist?

Please stop mapping like this, what you are contributing is not as per the HOT task or the actual content on the ground. Please ask your instructor or mapping party organiser to stop the activity and discuss with the HOT-OSM mailing list.

Don't map like this; it's wrong and will need to be reverted. Can you tell your instructor or mapping party host that this is inappropriate and to stop the activity.

Don't map like this; the task doesn't require forests

Why are you mapping like this, it has no relationship to the imagery or HOT task