Aitken Boulevard is visible now on Esri imagery at zoom 19, appears to be dual direction road

Ugh, when I added it originally it would have been for the boat shop on the corner of Tapleys/Old Port Road, and I've assumed it the commercial area stopped at Hardy Street

Worth marking landuse=construction?

At this point, I'm inclined to suggest reverting - this area had a whole lot of other fictional edits around ~2 years ago, its odd that it attracts them or its the same user with a new account vandalising.

With this one, we can maybe add two points (Yangoora, the Restaurant; and Anderson Hill, the Winery) - what do you think?

You might be interested in improveosm.org, which has a lot of GPS traces for roads - you've managed to get to a few of them, but plenty more in the area :)

I'm going to revert this, as it has marked a whole town as an amenity=toilet

It's probably better to model a number of these as residential road or minor/unclassified road; with surface unpaved

I've tagged this as au:R2-20 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia)

node/4865716957 and many of the others on this way seem to be duplicated nodes now
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=103611445

It's better to trace the individual building outline, not the entire block of land.

I'm going to wager that it would be very difficult to or even impossible to confirm this via survey as a web design office, I tend to prefer to leave this kind of detail off the map

It seems like this should definitely be reverted; some of those appear to be useful internal POI.

Landuse=residential is more appropriate, I've fixed this now

No problems; I must have accidentally been looking at digitalglobe premium/mapbox/bing only; though thought I checked the other layers.

No probs, it was just a quick survey on my part from a moving taxi; plus referring to LPI imagery after. If you've looked at it more recently happy to roll with that.

Hi, way/428124147 looks very different to the available imagery from all providers; are you sure its correct? If so, is it from survey or another source?

Hi!
Thanks for contributing. With buildings, we tend to trace the roofline of the building - osm.wiki/Buildings talks a bit about how to do it.

You've done the land around the house, which isn't necessarily wrong - but you might want to tag these as 'residential landuse' or similar.

Keep up the tracing!

Hi, welcome to openstreetmap.

Avoid adding information that can't be verified on the ground by survey, such as events ("X happened here", "Bought Y from here").

Oops, that might not have even been you adding the names on houses, my bad!

Hi!
Nice work on tracing the buildings. One thing to keep in mind is we don't tend to put people's names in or other personal data - I'll just edit those out now. Keep it up!