CloCkWeRX's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 38015404 | over 8 years ago | I've fleshed out some of the newly visible roads in the development via digitalglobe imagery, but if you are in the area and can survey the names of some of them, that'd be handy! |
| 40050017 | over 8 years ago | I added some of the roads being built visible in Digitalglobe imagery, but its far from well mapped. If you are familar with the area, did you want to have a look and possibly survey the current state? |
| 49789774 | over 8 years ago | With the playground on the beach, is that actually a playground? Imagery doesn't show it; and I don't recall seeing anything like that last time I was in that area... |
| 49786265 | over 8 years ago | With the buildings, try the 'S' shortcut to 'square' them (or right click, 'square') - can help get the edges.
|
| 49761815 | over 8 years ago | Is it better to maybe leave the address tags in place? I tend to use shop=vacant |
| 49760308 | over 8 years ago | You can see the actual buildings on the digital globe imagery (map layers -> background -> digital globe standard). I added the buildings as big 'blobs', you might like to add address points in if you know them |
| 41994686 | over 8 years ago | I've updated from newer imagery, if you know the road names/can survey around there that'd be helpful :) |
| 48732514 | over 8 years ago | Yeah, happy with that, just don't ask me to ride out and survey it again! |
| 49261124 | over 8 years ago | I tweaked the tagging |
| 29445769 | over 8 years ago | node/391524290 - this section of path between the two roads is where they indicated. |
| 29445769 | over 8 years ago | A strava user says: "L'itinéraire ne passe pas par la route. Il coupe au travers la foret au lieu de suivre la route. Il n'y a pas de sentier de foret à cet endroit. Merci de corriger ce problème. " |
| 49259727 | over 8 years ago | Have tweaked this a little further, based on DigitalGlobe imagery |
| 49255400 | over 8 years ago | Interesting, I can see it on plb.sa.gov.au imageery but its not named yet. Do you know if its stage 2 or stage 3 of the development (http://www.news.com.au/national/south-australia/developer-veritas-liberte-marketing-delbridge-court-beaumont-to-chinese-buyers/news-story/3934815c5eaca3d851763b6c2f9b95eb)? |
| 49121071 | over 8 years ago | Does it need some kind of theme park tagging? |
| 49090054 | over 8 years ago | Is there a retaining wall or similar we should tag with waterway=dam near the spillway? |
| 47580891 | over 8 years ago | Howdy, can you add to the note on note/909844#map=18/-30.63522/152.97526&layers=N ? Its a bit hard to tell the current state when looking at LPI imagery |
| 37623631 | over 8 years ago | Thoughts on classification of Ringwood Bypass (note/979260) ? |
| 37452764 | over 8 years ago | Howdy, thoughts on note/909840 ? |
| 43110595 | over 8 years ago | Hey, are you able to weigh in on note/785503 ? |
| 37754429 | over 8 years ago | Howdy, thoughts on note/909840 ? |