Hi,

Thanks for the update to the Incheon metro line 2. Are you sure the light_rail tagging is appropriate for this infrastructure though? Here's why I think it should remain tagged as subway:
- Electrification is via third rail and not overhead line
- train capacity is higher than typical light rail lines
- station Infrastructure is already built for 4 car trains
I would consider Incheon line 2 a "light metro", but not a "light rail". See the definition here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium-capacity_rail_system

Therefor, I would recommend changing the tagging of infrastructure and lines back to subway.

Thanks for fixing this. I wasn't aware of this malfunction of the wikidata matcher, but makes sense if the brand on wikidata also has a coordinate location for the headquarter :(

I didn't change anything in regard to the under construction state of line 4 in this changeset. But it looks like meanwhile someone already updated the operational status of the tracks here, so we should be good now: way/933094508

Hi and thanks for reaching out.
This might have gotten lost in translation, but: I didn't consciously deleted "ownership" information with this change. Which object and which tag on that object are you referring to?

Hi,
Can you explain why you deleted the route relations I created for CRT Line 9?

Oups. Changeset comment should say "Xi'an" instead of "Wuhan".

Changeset comment should read:
Updated power tagging

Changeset comment should read:
Updated power tagging

Changeset comment should read:
Updated power tagging

Hi,
Can you please clarify why you deleted many of station nodes along Cairo Metro line 1? Station nodes are not identical to stop positions that you left behind. Actually the stop positions only are fully usable if they are connected to stations via a stop_area relation.

Hallo,
Du hast wohl aus Versehen zu viel gelöscht hier: Die von dir gelöschten Wegsegmente sind keine Tunnels, sondern enthalten die Information, welche Bereiche abgedeckt (covered=yes) sind. Könntest du das bitte wieder rückgängig machen?

Hallo,
Ja, der Parkplatz ist öffentlich zugänglich (also access=yes) gegen Gebühr. Die Gebühr muss noch erfasst werden, da ich das vom Bahnsteig aus nicht sehen konnte :)

Changeset description should have read:
Details around Salam Terminal of IKA airport

building:use=healthcare ist definitiv korrekt. Ob das Gebäude allerdings als Praxisklinik erbaut wurde, weiss ich eben nicht sicher.

And to answer the question what the purpose of the stop_area relation is: It links all public transport stop infrastructure like stop position, platform, subway entrances, some times even ticketing systems to allow for routing.
I found the missing subway entrances via the Subway validator for Warsaw here: https://alexey-zakharenkov.github.io/subways/rapid/poland.html
...and you can see the yellow area connecting a stop area on the public transport map rendering here: http://öpnvkarte.de/#20.9993;52.2333;17

Thanks for fixing the name of the stop_area relation. I was only adding subway entrances, but didn't review correct station name.
Relation for Rondo ONZ:
relation/7591677
Relation for Rondo Daszyńskiego:
relation/7591678

Ich habe leider auch nach längerer Internetrecherche nicht herausfinden können, wann und als was diese Gebäude erstellt wurde. Der Bausubstanz nach zu urteilen, würde ich es als Gebäude zur überwiegenden Nutzung als Büros einordnen. Ich denke, die Nutzung als Praxisklinik kam erst später, daher mein Tagging. Wenn du da weitere Detailinformationen hast: Immer her damit und bitte verbessere das Tagging.

Hi Andy,
Thanks for the revert. I had seen that users fictional mapping in Northern Iran, too. I had a look at this area and my geometry fixes and they seem to be still valid.

Hi,
you added a second northbound lane to Chalus Road which doesn't exist. For example:
way/943489339
way/943489340
Please only add way data that actually exists in the real world and not made up or wishful elements.
Best regards,
Claudius

Hi,
I cannot see any construction on the ground for the Rasht-Gorgan Motorway that you added on the Mapbox Satellite imagery that you mentioned as source. Neither on Bing nor Maxar. Do you have another source?