Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
Thank you for your contribution. There's a few things you need to be aware of:
I've seen that you have added Google Earth link as references to multiple objects. Please be aware that you cannot use any information from Google Maps or Streetview as sources for your OpenStreetMap data contributions since their license is not compatible with OSM's. You need to either rely on the satellite imagery that is available within the OSM editor you are using or survey on the ground with a GPS device or your mobile.

Secondly: You marked "Old Trails Road" as a primary road which is the road category used in OSM for important roads linking cities. From what the satellite imagery shows this looks more like a residential or even service road. Have a look at the highway documentation here to familiarize yourself with the established categories: highway=*
Finally you set the "ref" tag to "none" which should be used for the road reference number. If a road doesn't have one just omit this tag and do not set it to "none".
Would be great if you can revisit your additions and improve them according to the information above.

Happy further mapping.

Woops. Location should ofc be "Balkayalar, Turkey" - Looked at wrong side of the border here

Source was DigitalGlobe only. Forgot to remove "Local survey" 🤦‍♂️

Source for this changeset wasn't "Local survey", but DigitalGlobe imagery

Hi Kiarash,
Can you please share the source for your mass addition of maxspeed all across Shahreza area?
You should only add maxspeed once you have verified the speed restrictions "on the ground" or via street level imagery like Mapillary or OpenStreetCam.

FYI: If your intent is to add "default maxspeed" to certain highway types: This is not necessary. If the maxspeed tag is not present all OSM data consumers will automatically default to a maxspeed level adequate to the highway type in the country.

This falls in line with a set of changesets you have been performing recently all over Iran where you have been applying maxspeed=* to whole cities. Can you please share your source for this information?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56717407

Hi Kiarash,
Can you please share the source for your mass addition of maxspeed all across Qom area?
You should only add maxspeed once you have verified the speed restrictions "on the ground" or via street level imagery like Mapillary or OpenStreetCam.

FYI: If your intent is to add "default maxspeed" to certain highway types: This is not necessary. If the maxspeed tag is not present all OSM data consumers will automatically default to a maxspeed level adequate to the highway type in the country.

This falls in line with a set of changesets you have been performing recently all over Iran where you have been applying maxspeed=* to whole cities. Can you please share your source for this information?

Can you please share the source for your mass addition of maxspeed all across this area?
You should only add maxspeed once you have verified the speed restrictions "on the ground" or via street level imagery like Mapillary or OpenStreetCam.

FYI: If your intent is to add "default maxspeed" to certain highway types: This is not necessary. If the maxspeed tag is not present all OSM data consumers will automatically default to a maxspeed level adequate to the highway type in the country.

This falls in line with a set of changesets you have been performing recently all over Iran where you have been applying maxspeed=* to whole cities. Can you please share your source for this information?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56719335

Can you please share the source for your mass addition of maxspeed all across this area?
You should only add maxspeed once you have verified the speed restrictions "on the ground" or via street level imagery like Mapillary or OpenStreetCam.

FYI: If your intent is to add "default maxspeed" to certain highway types: This is not necessary. If the maxspeed tag is not present all OSM data consumers will automatically default to a maxspeed level adequate to the highway type in the country.

This falls in line with a set of changesets you have been performing recently all over Iran where you have been applying maxspeed=* to whole cities. Can you please share your source for this information?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56719773

Can you please share the source for your mass addition of maxspeed all across Tabriz area?
You should only add maxspeed once you have verified the speed restrictions "on the ground" or via street level imagery like Mapillary or OpenStreetCam.

FYI: If your intent is to add "default maxspeed" to certain highway types: This is not necessary. If the maxspeed tag is not present all OSM data consumers will automatically default to a maxspeed level adequate to the highway type in the country.

This falls in line with a set of changesets you have been performing recently all over Iran where you have been applying maxspeed=* to whole cities. Can you please share your source for this information?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56720877

Can you please share the source for your mass addition of maxspeed all across Tabriz area?
You should only add maxspeed once you have verified the speed restrictions "on the ground" or via street level imagery like Mapillary or OpenStreetCam.

FYI: If your intent is to add "default maxspeed" to certain highway types: This is not necessary. If the maxspeed tag is not present all OSM data consumers will automatically default to a maxspeed level adequate to the highway type in the country.

This falls in line with a set of changesets you have been performing recently all over Iran where you have been applying maxspeed=* to whole cities. Can you please share your source for this information?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56722110

Can you please share the source for your mass addition of maxspeed all across Tabriz area?
You should only add maxspeed once you have verified the speed restrictions "on the ground" or via street level imagery like Mapillary or OpenStreetCam.

FYI: If your intent is to add "default maxspeed" to certain highway types: This is not necessary. If the maxspeed tag is not present all OSM data consumers will automatically default to a maxspeed level adequate to the highway type in the country.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56724343

Hallo Marinus,
Wie im Wiki Artikel ( osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway=motorway%20junction?uselang=de ) gehen die Meinungen zum Namenstagging an Park- oder Rastplatzausfahrten auseinander. Insofern halte ich die Einleitung der Notiz "name-tag ist laut wiki falsch!" nicht ganz richtig. Soweit ich das verstehe, besteht einfach kein Konsens.

Ich gehöre zu der Fraktion, die dafür ist, den Namen der Raststätte am highway=motorway_junction zu erfassen. Mein Argument ist, dass es eben wohl eine über ein Schild benannte Ausfahrt ist. Siehe auch das Beispielbild eines Schildes im Wikipedia-Artikel: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobahnparkplatz
In dem Sinne ist es eine Ausfahrt, aber keine Anschlussstelle. Diese Tatsache ist in meinen Augen ausreichend durch noref=yes dokumentiert.

Du kannst den Namen entfernen :) Ob es dadurch richtiger oder falscher wird ist Ansichtssache.

Hallo Andreas,
Wie im Wiki Artikel ( osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway=motorway%20junction?uselang=de ) gehen die Meinungen auseinander. Insofern halte ich die Einleitung der Notiz "name-tag ist laut wiki falsch!" nicht ganz richtig. Soweit ich das verstehe, besteht einfach kein Konsens.

Ich gehöre zu der Fraktion, die dafür ist, den Namen der Raststätte am highway=motorway_junction zu erfassen. Mein Argument ist, dass es eben wohl eine über ein Schild benannte Ausfahrt ist. Siehe auch das Beispielbild eines Schildes im Wikipedia-Artikel: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobahnparkplatz
In dem Sinne ist es eine Ausfahrt, aber keine Anschlussstelle. Diese Tatsache ist in meinen Augen ausreichend durch noref=yes dokumentiert.

Du kannst den Namen entfernen :) Ob es dadurch richtiger oder falscher wird ist Ansichtssache.

Hallo Andreas,
Wie im Wiki Artikel ( osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway=motorway%20junction?uselang=de ) gehen die Meinungen auseinander. Insofern halte ich die Einleitung der Notiz "name-tag ist laut wiki falsch!" nicht ganz richtig. Soweit ich das verstehe, besteht einfach kein Konsens.

Ich gehöre zu der Fraktion, die dafür ist, den Namen der Raststätte am highway=motorway_junction zu erfassen. Mein Argument ist, dass es eben wohl eine über ein Schild benannte Ausfahrt ist. Siehe auch das Beispielbild eines Schildes im Wikipedia-Artikel: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobahnparkplatz
In dem Sinne ist es eine Ausfahrt, aber keine Anschlussstelle. Diese Tatsache ist in meinen Augen ausreichend durch noref=yes dokumentiert.

Du kannst den Namen entfernen :) Ob es dadurch richtiger oder falscher wird ist Ansichtssache.

Part of this changeset you create an untagged veeery long way across the atlantic: way/557466480

I have deleted this already: changeset/56216548

Please review the JOSM review notifications before commiting your changeset as they are helpful to prevent such errors.

Happy mapping!

Acetheface954: You can find all your contributions listed in your changeset history. Click on your profile name on top right and then on the changeset link which should take you to @Acetheface954/history

Island Human: I'm trying to avoid it as often as possible. I know the pain when reviewing changes in a small area. You can use the OpenStreetMap Changeset Analyzer to review changesets in your area only: https://osmcha.mapbox.com

Hi,

It seems with this changeset you accidentally added a few very long untagged ways that encompass the whole globe. I removed those four in these two changesets:
changeset/55888507
changeset/55888571
Would be good if you could review that the other items you added in this changeset are okay.

Hi there, seems detaching the path from the peak that you moved didn't really work out.
I fixed this in my changeset changeset/55860192#map=14/33.8656/49.4512
Would be good if you could verify this makes sense now

Hi Chee Aun,
There's a difference between the public_transport=stop_position and the railway=station nodes. In a complete mapping for a subway station both exist and describe different features. The stop position is the location on one of the multiple tracks that a train in a certain direction stops. This is very useful information as when you use trains on the same line but in opposite directions you need to go to different stop positions in the station. As you see for a normal subway line station with two tracks for each direction you would already have two stop position nodes. Sometimes these stop positions have ref-tags as well, e.g. track 1 and track 2, but they differ from the station ref.

Additionally you would have either a node or an area for the building outline of the station. This is the OSM object that bears the station reference, e.g. ref=NS15 in case of Yio Chu Kang station.

These three nodes are combined using a public_transport=stop_area which you can find here: relation/7695977

So in fact 9 tags became 15 if you combine all the node and relation information. And as you can see the station reference is still left intact in the station node: node/206529415
btw. Maybe you can clear up if the amenity=bakery tag should remain on the station node. It looks like a tagging error.

Thanks