Hi,
a railway=station object is still needed for a complete metro station relation. the stop positions on the track alone are not sufficient.
I've reverted the deletion of the station in changeset/174859464

Hi,
I still think the correct tagging for the SkyShuttle should be monorail because it does not run on actual iron rails. In fact it is running on rubber wheels and the concrete guiderails serve just as that: guiding the rubber tyred vehicle on the concrete track. See the video here: https://youtu.be/lsh2rcEvBPk?si=ak8vrAVNKLpJxs22&t=132
So I would suggest to revert the tagging from light_rail to monorail
WDYT?

Changeset comment should have said:
"Neue Vorfahrt vor Universitätsklinikum Haus 7"
Source:
Local survey

Hi there, What's your reason for deleting the separate stop areas for the metro and tram stations at Wilhelminaplein? According to the definition of a stop area in OSM I would expect those to be compromised of separate stop areas. One hint is that on Wikidata there's separate items for both:
Metro station: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2169211
Tram stop: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q111430313

I would suggest to revert this change, restore the separate stop areas on the surface (tram+bus) and underground (metro).

Hi,
You have removed the majority of track members for multiple routes as part of this changeset. E.g.
relation/17271811
and
relation/17271812
which are now almost empty. Any chance you can fix that or should I go ahead and revert?

Best,
Claudius

Sorry for inadvertently having moved that polygon and thanks for fixing it again.

Changeset comment should state:
"Fixed railway station tagging #QA"

Thanks for clarification. The different route reference numbers per direction are definitely an oddity which I haven't seen anywhere else. This makes capturing it via OSM data consistenly quite tricky. I would suggest to merge the two route masters for lines 2 and 8 into one because the operation is so intertwined. The route master then would either have no reference or ref=2;8

What do you think?

Hi,
What's the reasons that you removed so much station and stop details information for the metro routes by merging them? The current combination of interchange station stops as one object removes a lot of details.

Very good argument. I cleaned up the combined stop area then to consolidate the station node object into just one for the stop area: changeset/161705148

Hi Alex,
Even though these two stations share their entrances they are physically quite apart and travellers need to walk a bit to change platforms. That's why I think they should be mapped as two separate stop_area relations which are linked as an interchange station via the parent stop_area_group. I would suggest reverting your edit therefor.
What do you think?

I removed the duplicate information from the polygon which was already present in the place=village node at node/303814147

Thanks for pointing out the duplication with the more granular landuse=residential already present. I've now removed the duplicate outer residential landuse: changeset/161163523