OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
36908650 over 9 years ago

No problem :) All sorted now.

38697968 over 9 years ago

Just to follow up on my previous message, this junction no longer looks like this. Please do not made significant changes JUST based on Aerial Imagery.

36908650 over 9 years ago

See this note: note/534341 for discussion.

36908650 over 9 years ago

Don't change it. I reverted the changes made as this junction has changed and is no longer as shown in the arial imagery.

36908650 over 9 years ago

Hi I was wondering what your sources are for these changes, for example the Junction between Trinity Crescent and Lower Granton Road was redesigned and and remapped. But your changes have undone this.

38575739 over 9 years ago

Hi again, I can't see the purpose of the area added?

38575913 over 9 years ago

Undid the remaining changes in 38640356. It looks like you aciddentlally moved some nodes easy to do!

Also I couldn't see the purpose of the area. So have removed ut.

Let me know if you have any questions on using OpenStreetMap!

38575913 over 9 years ago

Looks like accidental drags. Edinburgh has been fixed in #38632288 but Glagow changes still need reverting.

36788665 almost 10 years ago

One of the changes in this changeset is taking Dean Village from a suburb to a village. The normal convertion for Villages that have been absorbed into the city is to have them as suburbs - see Village/Suburb definitions: place=*

36653754 almost 10 years ago

Our normal convention in Edinburgh is to have addresses on nodes (see the rest of the street). Therefore I'm going to revert this changeset and fix the node typo manually.

36233720 almost 10 years ago

Thanks - looks great!

36204008 almost 10 years ago

I notice this changeset removes the overall landuse around the airport which adds in the grass, and includes the fence. But the work replacing the landuse area's isn't complete. Same thing for the fence.

35851998 about 10 years ago

Hi other comment/question, it looks like you deleted and then recreated exactly what you had deleted? Normally we recommend just modifying the existing ways rather than deleting and recreating them. Also I notice that you have removed the landuse area. What is your reason for doing this?

35849937 about 10 years ago

Traffic restrictions, had already been put in place by setting access=no over the bridge. (although the rendering of this isn't great). Wondering if this is better than by using junctions?

35381971 about 10 years ago

I have changed this back to 4. Original discussion was at: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap/55712

35381971 about 10 years ago

We need to have a think about the changes made here, I think we had a discussion on Talk-GB a while ago about Capital=yes versus Capital=4 and decided to go with a consitant approach between Scotland/Wales where Capital=4 I also need to remind myself how the is_in tag should be used.

35044892 about 10 years ago

Thanks Colin!

34241010 about 10 years ago

A general welcome to OpenStreetMap! This is a really great first Edit.I Just looking at the layout of the roads I don't suppose that this footpath also continues and connects onto Lothian Drive and/or Mayburn Road? Let me know if you have any question about OpenStreetMap.

Cheers
Chris

31949921 over 10 years ago

Just wondering what the reason for "upgrading" these to town is. Neiher is very big and my reasearch indicates that Village is probably more appropriate?

30873574 over 10 years ago

Hi, were these flats demolished?http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-24852067