What exactly are these?

What is this?

vssms - I will revert this change. Please don't destroy other peoples work, based on out of date imagery.

Except the latest imagery isn't up to date, I mapped this service lane from a GPs trace that I collected, when the new supermarket was built.

Looks good so far, agree there is still probably lots of details that can be removed. (keep meaning to go up and have a look myself as well!)

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for signing up and taking time to edit. I'm just having a look at your edits as you requested a review, and they the look great.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've been having a look over your edits and they all look great! Especially the work on Lochside Academy.

My only comment would be that if you have the whole named area enclosed such as by way/196300072 - the you might want to add a place=suburb name=Koncorth to enclose the named area.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for taking time to add the campsite, I was wondering if yo uhad any more details such as the name and address of the campsite?

Also let me know if you have any questions about OpenStreetMap.

Cheers
Chris

HI, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for taking time to edit. I do have a question about the change to Park. Normally Park would refer to open land, so unless the trees have been cutr down, then woods is probably a better tag. See leisure=park

Let me knnow if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

Hi - I can see that you requested a review of this edit. Sorry about the delay. I've made a small additional change, which is setting the shop to disused:shop - that way we can keep the node and update it with any new tenant when they move in.

Let me know if you have any questions, cheers
Chris

HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap - Thanks for signing up and taking the time to edit!

I do have a curious question about your edit. It seems unusual that there would be an odd numbered address amongst all the even numbered property? and I just wanted to double to check that this is correct?

Also let me know if you have any questions!

Thanks!

HI thanks for the edit - I see that you requested a review. The edit looks fine to me, initially I was concerned that you had moved the peak from the previous position that look to align with historic maps. But looking at contour lines and the path - the updated location makes sense. I'm just wondering what your source fdor the change is.

Thanks Chris

Hi thanks for signing up - I see that you requested an review and can confirm that your edit looks great. Sometime we tag churches as building=church - but it's not strictly necessary. Also if you are familure with the building, adding the address and postcode is useful.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Perfect, thanks Jono.

Thanks for adding this. I didn't know about ity. I've made a few improvements to the tagging but thanks for the info.

Thanks - I think I had already reverted this change. But sounds like all bad edits and no responses.

Thanks for the edit. I have added the actual trackoutline.

Hi - why did you remove this. I think this is actually present on the ground unless you have other information?

Hi thanks for asking for a review of this. Livingsteet doesn't quite seem right to me? IS this more of a service road?