Thanks for the edit, wondering if we should come up with some "standard" or tagging for narrow gaps in barriers etc?

Hi thanks for the edit, but sector 4 seems like a very odd name?

HI Keith, thanks for your edit. I see that you requested a review of this edit. I'm wondering if this would be better tagged as a buulding=yes to represent the building as well as shop=laundry - shop=laundry

Please let me know if you have any questions

Cheers
Chris

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you've requested a review and can report that this edit looks great.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

Hi - welcome to OpenStreetMap - I see that you have changed the address if the business? If so I think that we need to create a new node in the new location?

Hi - Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you requested a review and I've had a look at your edits and they all look great.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

Sounds great. Thanks for getting back to me.

Only thing to watch out for is the copyright if your're using 3rd party maps as sources.

HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap - I have just one quick question about why you removed the name in this change?

Also let mew know if you have any question about OpenStreetMap

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap . I see that you requested a review and yoiur edit looks excellent.

My only comments are to bear in mind that we can't use other sources such as the leaflet you linked to as direct sources, but I appreciate it is useful to point as a reason for you changes to the park boundaries, which look to be based on the OSM imagery layer?

My only other comment is that the park is currently mapped as 2 parts of a single relation, in this circumstance the relation isn't adding much value and a single "way" work work fine, but this is a minor quibble.

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

Hi, I just wanted to follow up FraserKp;'s question.

It would be good to get clarity on the sources used for these Edits? As you know we can't risk using data from copyright sources. In general the OS Opendata StreetView and the NLS Historoic layers are great for confirming names.

again - I don't believe this to be a park. This has been mapped as woods for nearly 7 years and has been edited as such by several people. Have all the trees been cut down and this turned into a park?

Why park and not a forest?

Hi Andrew - we seem to be stuck in a loop. Pleas eanswer why do you belive these to be parks?

Hi Katie, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for the edit.

I see that you requested a review - and the edit looks great. My only tip is that when adding building it's possible to use the s key shortcut to "square" off the buildings which is a bit neater.

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions.

Hi - and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Just wondering if you had seen the message above. Normally these look like gardens to me rather than Parks?

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap - I see that you requested a review of your edits. I've had a lok and the edits look great to me.

But let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

H, Welcome to OpenStreetMap - thank you for your edits.

I see that you requested a review, I've had a quick look over and can't see any problems.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

I would add that a park is somewhere you would make a trip to visit. And that this would differentiate if from other green spaces.

A further factor - in this case is that many mappers have mapped thousands of Tenement Gardens in Edinburgh and consistently tagged them as gardens.

Are you happy that this is a garden and not a park?

In this case because it's a private garden.

I would expect some kind on public access.

They would normally be maintained for recreational purposes.

Does this make sense?

Second video is up. https://youtu.be/pwI97D3DMKs

Also where is the lake?