OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
37934158 almost 10 years ago

Sorry the above links are broken!!
1.way/404524598/history
2.way/404419498/history#map=17/28.46999/77.18602
3.way/143562778/history
4.way/143562778/history

37934158 almost 10 years ago

Hi anusha,

Great progress in mapping roads. Improved in tagging roads. Few observations here to rework too.
1. Always split the roads - way/404430404/history|https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404527188/history|https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404430396/history|https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404419498/history
2.If the roads aren't clear in the imagery, do not trace them. way/404524598/history

Happy mapping!

37805202 almost 10 years ago

Hi @anushakavali,

@manings has already commented on your changeset number: 37824465. Link is here.

changeset/37824465#map=17/28.47609/77.26176

And also, whatever the `unclassified` roads you've mapped must be `path` (Only human can) or `track` (used for agriculture purpose). Can you take a look and revert.

Also feel free to comment here.

37704797 almost 10 years ago

Hi @00crashtest,

Seems like you're changing major roads tags. I have observed that you've made change to US 101 from highway=primary to trunk which is incorrect. I have reverted your 2 changesets : 37704797, 37704671.

Feel free to post your comment on this changeset.

Chetan

37834967 almost 10 years ago

Hi @osm0123456789,
Seems like you have imported lot of data. According to the OSM import guidelines, the imports must be added to the wiki and should mention correct "source" to it.

osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue

37784896 almost 10 years ago

Hi Manisha,

Nice to see your edits on OpenStreetMap. Seems like you haven't downloaded data before mapping. You've created many unnecessary roads on major trunk roads. Please ensure to download new data before you map and upload.

1.way/403307235/history
2.way/403307231/history
3.way/403307283/history
4.way/403307266/history

I'm reverting your changeset: 37784896

Please go through OSM Wiki on highway tagging system in India. osm.wiki/India:Tags/Highway

Also I see many untagged ways. 1.way/403307230/history
2.way/403307228/history
3.way/403307227/history

Feel free to comment on this changeset.

37805202 almost 10 years ago

Hi @anushakavali,
Great to see your edits and nice progress on the task. And also I observe most of the roads in this changeset should be reworked. `Unclassified` road can't be tagged for temporary paths/tracks.

For more information (India Highway wiki) : osm.wiki/India:Tags/Highway

* Here are the few roads link to retag:
1. way/213101662/history
2. way/213101623/history
3. way/403511232/history

* This way is untagged. way/403511210/history

* This highway is overlapping on building: way/403511300/history

Also keep an eye on Map features: osm.wiki/Map_Features

37457576 almost 10 years ago

Hey geopeppe,
The imports must be documented in OSM wiki. Can you clarify these 3 questions.

1. The buildings are in cluster not as individual ones.
2. The source of the data is not clear.
3. There's no documentation of the import.

And the github issue is open to clear all the confusion. Please take a look.
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/156

37017914 almost 10 years ago

Hi @DaGal, You should not use Google Street View to add data to OSM.

37102196 almost 10 years ago

Great! Local knowledge for mapping is always good. Happy happing : )

37102196 almost 10 years ago

Hey @bstrasz looks like you are using Google Street view. You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information.

osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

37093673 almost 10 years ago

Hey @wlh_171, you should not Google Tms for mapping in OSM. This could be certainly vandalism. Please don't use google.

36930769 almost 10 years ago

Hi Sebarga Shozodalaisov, You are doing well for OpenStreetMap. I appreciate that. It'd be very nice to leave comments before uploading. Thank you. : )

36711416 almost 10 years ago

@deepank I checked your edits, looks like the there is imagery level difference. I'd suggest you to map by keeping Bing imagery at least zoom level of 19 or in 28 meters. (You can see in JOSM on the top left hand side)

And, also I observed that the comment remains the same for any changes. Comments are more important to give information for other mappers that what exact changes are made.

Buildings are tagged in bad ways inside the campus. It'd be better to map using JOSM building plugin. I'm sending you some changes that I made here. Have look into it and map them as it is.

way/133654121/history#map=18/22.31739/87.30651

way/133660607/history

Happy Mapping : )

Chetan

34901403 almost 10 years ago

Thanks. @pratikyadav

35985873 almost 10 years ago

@dannykath, thanks for finding this. Realigned the building.
way/386165512/history

35987346 almost 10 years ago

@dannykath, realigned the buildings.
way/386175652/history

35987225 almost 10 years ago

@dannykath, The first building is quite clearly mapped. Don't need to realign. And the second building is realigned.
way/385961770/history. Thank you for finding this.

31917716 about 10 years ago

Great!! @Glassman.

33259018 over 10 years ago

Thanks for the feedback. It looks like abandoned railway. As there was railway line, I added the crossings. Now I deleted the crossings