Are you sure bicycle access is prohibited here? By default, universities are public and almost always accessible to bicycle and foot transit.

The Walmart was already mapped as a node. Please verify for duplicates before editing. Thanks!

Boul Hymus is continuing until Route Transcanadienne, as you fixed. However, the northeastbound is named Henri-Bourassa ouest. I updated it.

Can you point out the wiki part you mention? I do not seem to find it. bicycle=dismount seems legit here.

In Quebec, bicycle access is prohibited by law on all sidewalks, except when permitted with a specific sign. Thus, by default, it should be dismount. Park footpaths are ambiguous, but we usually tag them bicycle=dismount except when part of a cycleway network or when bicycle pictograms can be found. Some routing engines now block access to bicycle when bicycle=no even at walking speed (dismounted), so it is safer to not cut access to parks to bicycle routing engines and keep the bicycle=dismount value.
Thanks and have a nice day!

Hi! Please use bicycle=dismount instead of bicycle=no, except if there is a specific sign saying you cannot even bring the bicycle while dismounted (almost never happen in Quebec, except inside some buildings)

See cycleway=link for cycleway links.

Such connections are called links/connectors and are needed, especially in Quebec, since we map sidewalks with the tag bicycle=no, because it is the law in the province, contrary to almost anywhere else in the world. For this reason, the router will never have access to a lot of parks because bicycle=no should stop the router to use sidewalks to access parks without a proper cycleway in them. Thus we need the links/connectors so someone wanting to go to a park must be able to reach it, even if there is a kerb. Instead of deleting it, you can change the bicycle=yes tag to bicycle=dismount so we know we should dismount because of kerbs. You mentioned "tagging for the router" with a link to the wiki. In the wiki page, none of the examples concerns this kind of links/connectors, which is documented here: footway=link
The reason why this tag (footway=link or cycleway=link) was not used instead of a crossing is that it is still not available in most routing engines, but when that will be the case, we will update them in the Montreal area.
Thanks!

I don't think this is a residential road. This access road is for the Oratoire only. Which source did you use to select residential as the highway tag instead of service here? Thanks!

Bonjour! Merci pour les nombreuses mises à jour!

Ici, il serait préférable de conserver le petit lien pour connecter le parc à la rue pour les vélos, car les trottoirs sont interdits aux vélos (bicycle=no) et certains calculateurs de chemin n'auraient plus d'accès au parc pour les vélos. Je l'ai remis. Merci!

Est-ce que cette cour d'école est fermée au publique en dehors des heures de cours et l'été?

Excellent! On poursuit la conversation en messages privés.

À plus!

OK, super! Alors ce serait bien qu'on vous montre notre éditeur custom pour ces besoins. Je vous contacte par message privé.

Si vous faites de l'édition pour le compte d'une organisation, municiaplité ou autre, il faut ajouter une note entrée dans osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities

Nous l'avons fait de notre côté pour Chaire Mobilité (Polytechnique Montréal)

On peut poursuivre en français si vous préférez. C'est seulement pour permettre aux autres usagers de comprendre le contexte.

When you delete something, you should tel in the changeset message why and from which source. If you use land registry data, you need to ask permission from the MRNF (Ministère des ressources naturelles) and from MAMH (Ministère des affaires municipales et de l'Habitation) since the data available on Données Québec is with license CC 4.0, which is not fully compatible with OBDl (OSM). However, we are in the process of getting permission from both ministries to be able to use it. But we must be patient. You can get the discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/acceptation-du-mode-dattribution-dopenstreetmap-par-le-gouvernement-du-quebec/127403

Why? Explain why you delete things.

Why did you remove landuse?

OK, that's fine. Next time, just add this source and explanation in the changeset message. Thanks!

Hi! Can you give a source for this change? Where did you find that it was better to use as a secondary road?

This segment is passable for bicycle and foot traffic, A lot of joggers pass through there everyday. However, it does not seem to be ccessible by cars. Did they remove the bollards and/or opened the tunnel back?

Hi!

Can you explain why you reduced precision on the motorway? These segments were aligned precisely using geodesic data. Please do not touch motorways in the Montreal area before asking. Thanks!