SVP conserver les accès pour routing aux playgrounds et terrains de sport (routing:entrance) et chemin d'accès, autrement, on ne sait pas où envoyer les piétons et vélos lorsque'ils font un calcul de chemin sur un terrain/polygone (quand on voit la photo aérienne, c'Est évident, mais il faut penser que nous faisons des analayses avec des milliers de lieux d'activité à la fois et que le suivi est impossible à la pièce). Utiliser le centroïde quand on n'a pas le routing:entrance peut occasionner des trajets irréalistes. Aussi, ces routing:entrance servent à l'analyse des lieux d'activité en tant que points au lieu de polygones, ce qui est beaucoup plus utile et plus simple. Merci pour votre travail!

Please keep our notes there, since it is used as an official database to choose which paths should be added by the municipalities.

Please keep the crossings at each intersection, otherwise pedestrian routing will be broken (if you use a routing engine to go from rue Resther north of Saint-Grégoire to Rue Resther south of Rue Saint-Grégoire, it will make a long detour to Saint-Hubert or Berri, which is non realistic. Unmarked crossing are especially made for this. Crossing is legal at almost every intersection.

En fait, si les noms de rues ne sont pas ajoutés aux trottoirs, les indications pour un piéton seront très imprécises:
- Continuer tout droit
- Tourner à gaucher
- Tourner à droite
...
au lieu de:
- Continuer sur Rue Saint-Urbain
- Tourner à gauche sur Rue Mont-Royal
- Tourner à droite sur Rue Saint-Denis

ce qui est beaucoup plus clair, et semblable aux indications pour les voitures.

Quand les trottoirs ne sont pas dessinés séparément aux rues, ça va, mais quand les trottoirs sont dessinés séparément (ce qui est beaucoup plus courant de nos jours pour plus de précision), c'est nécessaire de nommer les trottoirs et pistes cyclables aussi. Le mieux serait d'avoir des relations qui lient les trottoirs aux rues, mais aucun standard n'a encore été proposé à ce sujet.

Please keep street names on sidewalks and crossings, otherwise routing for pedestrian will become unusable. Thanks!

Juste la zone à haute résolution dans la région de Montréal. :-)

The previous alignment was done with precise Géodesie Québec aerial photography, which is aligned by official geodesic points and data.

Please be careful when realigning data, since Bing aerial photography are misaligned. You should use the offset 0.6,-1.54 in the Montreal area in the id editor

They could be mapped as building=shed, which would be correct

Also, please do not delete precise mapping of buildings (we were careful to map the clubhouse buildings precisely with aerial imagery, why did you deleted it and recreated a rough version?)

You added trees as buildings. Please use the correct tags for trees and/or wood (natural=wood)

This changeset breaks the water polygon for ake Saint-Louis. Please fix or someone will need to revert.

Is there a reason why mulitple values on the entrance tag is not accepted? There are a lot of hosues with a unique entrance for both the residents and the customers (hirdresser or home offices) or barns/farm building where the pedestrian entrance is also the garage door.

Please do not remove road building passages. And also, the buildings were already aligned with official geodesic data.

Please do not remove cycleway connectors. This will make routing for bicycle problematic.

Ok, so this is legit, but please add a website, and some description, so other editors don't think it is ponctual information.

If this is recurrent or permanent, please add more information, like a website or something.

Please don't add ponctual meeting points. OpenStreetMap is for permanent data and not for specific events information. Thanks!

Chaire Mobilite is a research laboratory in Transporation at Polytechnique Montreal.
https://www.polymtl.ca/mobilite/
I am a research associate in this lab and the main OpenStreetMap editor in the team, but some times, there are students adding or validating data to.

Here are all the cases in the montreal area:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1uH1

Please read this thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/use-of-bicycle-designated-vs-bicycle-yes-outside-of-germany/3230/47
especially this part:
"However, because OSM-Carto puts the blue color on any path marked with bicycle=designated, I think it will continue to reoccur where people will use this tag in order to show a particular path as a bicycle path, irregardless of legal status."