bizarre! Alors on garde bicycle=yes

hi!

Please be careful moving nodes we carefully placed. Your aerial imagery seems to be wrong. We are using official geodesic data to align sidewalks and roads. I may have to revert this hard work you did if I find too much misaligned data. Next time, please ask the local community and make smaller changes. Thanks! Please contact your colleagues since they may have the same issue.

Hi!

Please be careful when you remove crossings or links, because the link you removed at the end of Chemin Bates makes pedestrian routing impossible between Chemin Bates and the sidewalk on Avenue McEachran. I will fix. Thanks!

Hi!

Please do not realign nodes as they were aligned using geodesic precise data. The aerial imagery available in most editors is not aligned correctly. Thanks!

Hi!

Please be careful moving nodes we carefully placed. Your aerial imagery seems to be wrong. We are using official geodesic data to align sidewalks and roads. I may have to revert this hard work you did if I find to much misaligned data. Next time, please ask the local community and make smaller changes. Thanks! Please contact your colleages since they may have the same issue.

hi!

Please be careful moving nodes we carefully placed. Your aerial imagery seems to be wrong. We are using official geodesic data to align sidewalks and roads. I may have to revert this hard work you did if I find to much misaligned data. Next time, please ask the local community and make smaller changes. Thanks! Please contact your colleages since they may have the same issue.

Je me demande si c'est vraiment un mauvais tag... bicycle=dismount sur un traversier, c'est normal non?

OK, perfect! I guess it is temporary. I will put a construction area.

Did you survey the area? It was oneway in 2024. Please confirm that this has ben changed since.

If you see the addresses around this street, their street name is Allée Beaurepaire, so I put that into the official name tag (and name:fr) and put Beaurepaire Drive into name:en

I am waiting for response from MRNF, MAMH and MTMD (three misnitries with a lot of open data on street names and addresses). We need them to accept that we use their data on OSM even if their CC 4.0 licence is not 100% compatible. See this thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/acceptation-du-mode-dattribution-dopenstreetmap-par-le-gouvernement-du-quebec/127403/15

Also, why remove sidewalk presence tags on service roads? It is perfectly valid and makes routing engine for pedestrian route foot traffic on the sidewalk instead of the road. Thanks!

In general, you should not remove tags before asking the previous editor or the community.

When there is a dual carriage we usually count the other direction's sidewalk as present. Otherwise it will be impossible to compare presence of sidewalks on different kind of roads (dual carriage vs single). Please consider the other side sidewalk presence. Thanks!

The alternate names were carefully fetched from different sources and should stay there. beaurepaire alone is not a valid name, it is missing the generic (Rue, Boulevard, Avenue...)

Perfect thanks!

Hi!

Please be careful, this edit removed the whole ramp to Boulevard Louis-H.-Lafontaine.

Also, there is an unmarked crossing there, since otherwise, it would be impossible to follow the sidewalk on the other side of the road. Unmarked crossing must be added for routing even if there is no marking. Please ask before removing crucial data.

Excellent! Bonne fin de semaine!

Ici, chemin d'Hydro-Québec large avec piste cyclable intégrée:
way/219861677#map=17/45.301765/-74.058612

Ici courst segment permettant l'accès à un bâtiment pour les employés:

way/1003777056#map=19/45.325514/-73.997573

Et celui-là, bien connu, emprunté par les clients de l'église et du jardin communautaire:

way/1320757334#map=19/45.547422/-73.624510

Sur overpass:

way["highway"="service"]["bicycle"="designated"]

Je laisserais les tags qui permettent le mieux au plus grand nombre de calculateurs de fonctionner, peu importe le mode de transport. De toute façon, motor_vehicle=private sera très clair sur le fait que ce n'est pas accessible au public en voiture. Donc je propose highway=service
motor_vehicle=private
bicycle=designated
et si tu veux cycleway=track pour dire que c'est une piste cyclable en site propre qui est à même la rue. Sinon cycleway=shared_lane. On est en présence d'un cas particulier quand même.

bicycle=diseignated, c'Est jsutement quand la rue n'Est pas spécifiquement une piste cyclable, mais que les vélos y sont désignés. Souvent dans certains grands parcs où les camions employés peuvent circuler, ou des clients d'un camping par exemple. Il y a ussi certains segments de rues qui sont, pour quelques mètres permis aux résidents ou aux clients.