OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
151064519 over 1 year ago

Haha! Merci aussi d'être allé vérifié!

151064519 over 1 year ago

Cette discussion, bien qu'ancienne, est intéressante:
https://blog.fagstein.com/2009/09/24/no-bikes-on-summit-circle-path/

151064519 over 1 year ago

J'ai fait quelques recherches et il semble que les vélos soient interdits DANS le parc mais pas sur le chemin Summit circle. Par contre, les résidents peuvent bloquer les vélos par frustation, mais sans raison si on roule sur le chemin. Les pancartes installées (que je n'ai pas vues) concernent les sentiers, mais pas le chemin principal. On pourrait mettre bicycle=permissive et mettre une note expliquant cela?

151064519 over 1 year ago

J'y suis passé la semaine passée et il n'y avait pas de pancarte interdisant les vélos. Le sentier est très large et je vois mal pourquoi ce serait interdit... Au moins mettre bicycle=dismount si vous êtes certain qu'il y a une pancarte qui a été installée cette semaine. Merci!

150942661 over 1 year ago

Hi! Thanks for the updates. Did you use the offset 0.6,-1.54 like explained here: osm.wiki/Montr%C3%A9al (Bing Maps Offset)

150775209 over 1 year ago

:-)

150817104 over 1 year ago

There is no shelter there in the middle of the road. What exactly did you survey there?

150775209 over 1 year ago

Please keep bicycle=yes when it is permitted on footpaths because some routing engine could otherwise ignore these connections.

150715679 over 1 year ago

Please keep bicycle connections, otherwise cycle routing would force to use the sidewalk dismounted on Place Bourdon if a bicycle wants to route from Boulevard Milan to Rue Bergevin.

150671057 over 1 year ago

Thanks for the updates on crossing marked with lines. However, the street was correctly aligned using precise local aerial photography. I reverted the alignement. For oneway streets with single car lane, the way should be aligned in the center of the car lane, even if a bicycle lane is taking space on one side. :-)

150638004 over 1 year ago

Haha! Si vous croyez que c'est un endroit pour entreposer des déchets de manière permanente, alors go pour landfill!

150638004 over 1 year ago

Ça devrait pas plutôt être brownfield? landfill est pour des déchet normalement

150463727 over 1 year ago

yes but please read through, you will see that routing is still not doable on areas. The concensus right now in the community is to map both the aresa and the ways

150464952 over 1 year ago

Hi! Is there a no-bicycle sign there? Usually, it is permitted to ride a bicycle on any street except motorways or streets with a specific no-bicycle sign.

150462594 over 1 year ago

This changeset delete footways and thus will break routing in this area. I have to revert this. Can you explain why you deleted footways? Footway areas are ok to use, but you need to keep the highway footways as no routing engine can route on areas.

150463727 over 1 year ago

Sorry this was the incorrect changest for the deletion: see changeset/150462594 instead

150463727 over 1 year ago

This changeset delete footways and thus will break routing in this area. I have to revert this. Can you explain why you deleted footways? Footway areas are ok to use, but you need to keep the highway footways as no routing engine can route on areas.

150425490 over 1 year ago

Why a node in Quebec was changed in this changeset?

150322531 over 1 year ago

You can keep the entrance tag also, since it describes the door itself

150322531 over 1 year ago

Please use railway=train_station_entrance
instead of subway_entrance, which is only for subway networks.