ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 151064519 | over 1 year ago | Haha! Merci aussi d'être allé vérifié! |
| 151064519 | over 1 year ago | Cette discussion, bien qu'ancienne, est intéressante:
|
| 151064519 | over 1 year ago | J'ai fait quelques recherches et il semble que les vélos soient interdits DANS le parc mais pas sur le chemin Summit circle. Par contre, les résidents peuvent bloquer les vélos par frustation, mais sans raison si on roule sur le chemin. Les pancartes installées (que je n'ai pas vues) concernent les sentiers, mais pas le chemin principal. On pourrait mettre bicycle=permissive et mettre une note expliquant cela? |
| 151064519 | over 1 year ago | J'y suis passé la semaine passée et il n'y avait pas de pancarte interdisant les vélos. Le sentier est très large et je vois mal pourquoi ce serait interdit... Au moins mettre bicycle=dismount si vous êtes certain qu'il y a une pancarte qui a été installée cette semaine. Merci! |
| 150942661 | over 1 year ago | Hi! Thanks for the updates. Did you use the offset 0.6,-1.54 like explained here: osm.wiki/Montr%C3%A9al (Bing Maps Offset) |
| 150775209 | over 1 year ago | :-) |
| 150817104 | over 1 year ago | There is no shelter there in the middle of the road. What exactly did you survey there? |
| 150775209 | over 1 year ago | Please keep bicycle=yes when it is permitted on footpaths because some routing engine could otherwise ignore these connections. |
| 150715679 | over 1 year ago | Please keep bicycle connections, otherwise cycle routing would force to use the sidewalk dismounted on Place Bourdon if a bicycle wants to route from Boulevard Milan to Rue Bergevin. |
| 150671057 | over 1 year ago | Thanks for the updates on crossing marked with lines. However, the street was correctly aligned using precise local aerial photography. I reverted the alignement. For oneway streets with single car lane, the way should be aligned in the center of the car lane, even if a bicycle lane is taking space on one side. :-) |
| 150638004 | over 1 year ago | Haha! Si vous croyez que c'est un endroit pour entreposer des déchets de manière permanente, alors go pour landfill! |
| 150638004 | over 1 year ago | Ça devrait pas plutôt être brownfield? landfill est pour des déchet normalement |
| 150463727 | over 1 year ago | yes but please read through, you will see that routing is still not doable on areas. The concensus right now in the community is to map both the aresa and the ways |
| 150464952 | over 1 year ago | Hi! Is there a no-bicycle sign there? Usually, it is permitted to ride a bicycle on any street except motorways or streets with a specific no-bicycle sign. |
| 150462594 | over 1 year ago | This changeset delete footways and thus will break routing in this area. I have to revert this. Can you explain why you deleted footways? Footway areas are ok to use, but you need to keep the highway footways as no routing engine can route on areas. |
| 150463727 | over 1 year ago | Sorry this was the incorrect changest for the deletion: see changeset/150462594 instead |
| 150463727 | over 1 year ago | This changeset delete footways and thus will break routing in this area. I have to revert this. Can you explain why you deleted footways? Footway areas are ok to use, but you need to keep the highway footways as no routing engine can route on areas. |
| 150425490 | over 1 year ago | Why a node in Quebec was changed in this changeset? |
| 150322531 | over 1 year ago | You can keep the entrance tag also, since it describes the door itself |
| 150322531 | over 1 year ago | Please use railway=train_station_entrance
|