I don't understand. This is where you seem to be claiming all slip roads should be link, but admit that some cannot be. Hence my suggestion above that after the previous discussion you've seen that not all slip roads can/should be link. Is this not the case?

To be completely clear, can I just check with you that you've seen that the A516 runs from the Derby inner ring road to the A50 N of Hilton, and the only part that is not the A516 is where the A38 ref takes precedence. The roundabout outside the Royal Derby Hospital is not the termination and the A516 does not run along the (now tertiary) Uttoxeter Road any more. The change from OSM primary to OSM trunk at the roundabout is probably because of the newer road design/build standard not because an A38 connection exists; the A516 (OSM) trunk continues to N of Hilton.

In the absence of roads linking between A roads or terminating to/from lower types, I do not see that the trunk_link page description has any relevance. The wiki description of trunk roads says highway=trunk. Does this trunk status (which I regard as higher status) not 'win' over OSM's provision of a trunk_link concept to mark roads which connect to/from such ways and generally have no ref or name themselves.

I'm trying the keep the map correct, not to disturb your editting.

So why is it you think 2 parts of the main route of the A516 (but not others) need to be labelled as _link ways?

You came to the previous discussion with the assertion that 'all slip roads shall be link' and after some discussion you concluded that assertion to be false. In the absence of ways linking between A roads, no _link is present.

Wrong, the 2 slips leading to/from the east are the A6, not _link. (The other two to/from the west are connections between the A6 and the A50 and were correctly marked differently as _link). Not every slip road is a _link as previously identified to you.

Wrong at changeset/140063384 (see discussion there) and wrong again. A reminder that there are no link roads here, is a direct merge of two A roads.

This is merely more of the existing tagging along the HS2 route which seeks to differentiate between the land which will become railway (landuse=construction,construction=railway) and that which is currently construction temporarily and is presumed destined to be returned to be useful farmland (assuming the ground level is returned to 'natural'). I don't know where it started. It's imperfect and could be construction=farmland but that is not the purpose of the construction. No construction= tag/value at all could probably be better but then validators would bleat.

"roof:shape=dome" non è un valore previsto o significativo per "barrier=hedge".

Quando riparerai l'etichettatura errata?
changeset/148518846

È necessario risolvere questo problema prima di continuare ad apportare nuove modifiche.

Reverted for misaligning building and adding fiction.

I ask again, what is the source of your information for details that cannot be seen on the Bing imagery?

No meaningful reply, fiction reverted. #DWG

@ivanbranco Agreed, clearly there is no human comprehension here. Have wasted too much time on this 'person', will prepare a bunch of notes and also report to DWG as soon as I can.

pboscherini,
Devi rispondere senza usare l'intelligenza artificiale alla domanda originale, confermare che ora capisci l'uso di "building" e "building:part", l'uso corretto di "layer" e che correggerai gli errori che hai commesso.
Devi dichiarare onestamente quali fonti utilizzi per le forme e le altezze di questo e di altri stadi sportivi che hai modificato.
Se non lo fai, il tuo account utente verrà segnalato, probabilmente verrà bloccato e le tue modifiche potrebbero essere annullate in blocco.
Capisci?

Perché stai aggiungendo queste curiosità irrilevanti quando hai almeno 50 ponti fluviali con falsi tunnel=culvert sotterranei sotto di loro che hai creato e che devi riparare. Così come molte piccole aree di "building" che devi correggere in "building:part".

Inoltre, qual è la fonte di questa modifica? È necessaria una risposta onesta a questa domanda.

La tua divisione errata della linea centrale del fiume Yarra e delle rotte dei traghetti a Melbourne è stata riparata. Tutto il falso tunnel=canale sotterraneo (fiume e traghetto) e lo strato=-1 (fiume) sotto i 5 ponti sono scomparsi.

È errato utilizzare amenity=parking per singoli posti auto all'interno di un amenity=parking esistente. Devono essere modificati in amenity=parking_space.
Inoltre, capacity:disabled non è un tag supportato.
Si prega di leggere amenity=parking_space

Si tratta chiaramente di una connessione telefonica/a banda larga. È sbagliato aggiungerlo come linea elettrica e pali. Si prega di rimuovere.

AI output will not be replied to. If you have something coherent you want to say, write it yourself. Italian is fine, we can translate it.
All'output dell'AI non verrà data risposta. Se hai qualcosa di coerente che vuoi dire, scrivilo tu stesso. L'italiano va bene, possiamo tradurlo.
Cebderby

2 wrongly removed islands undeleted, and lakes' names case fixed x5.
A reply from user webhound would be appreciated.

Wrongly removed island undeleted and re-added as lake multipolygon inner member. Names case fixed:
Note to user webhound: name= tag should only contain the proper (and verifiable) name of the feature, in title case ie capitalised initial letters, rest lower case, eg "Oxlease Lake". Not all upper case, not some words in lower case. You should also indicate your source somewhere for these names when you add them.

False (english) primary name and trashing of well mapped water areas, false 2nd outer water area covering land and buildings by new user reverted: changesets 147225388, 147227951, 147228069, 147228151
User webhound, if you know these water areas to be fishing=private, you are welcome to add this information, but do not trash the map in doing so.