Cebderby's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 144863983 | about 2 years ago | parking areas changed to buildings here
|
| 145103033 | about 2 years ago | more non-buildings eg wood areas changed to buildings here
|
| 145104099 | about 2 years ago | You've changed some non-building features into buildings in this and other changesets, these need setting back to the relevant tagging or the changesets will need to be reverted.
|
| 144805983 | about 2 years ago | One other thought Mike, you've added some nice paths through the (mostly) trees area to the south and west. They show as very pale grey on the standard map as they've got access=no which is actually not at all necessary for paths as all motor vehicles are automatically disallowed anyway. Without this tag they'll show as clearer (dashed red) paths. And where you can enter/exit them from the roads, they can (should) actually join to the road so they can be routed along, which you may find useful for race route planning. Looks like there are 3? places on the main road and one on the W side which may connect and currently don't quite. |
| 144805983 | about 2 years ago | I did add the designation=public_footpath + foot=designated through here, and drew in the bridged private driveway (it was just visible in the aerial images and on one of the old ford pictures) from what was discussed + shared before. So probably the only thing to choose is what to do with the short bit of (ex-)track through the ford - it can probably be changed to disused:highway=track. |
| 144870426 | about 2 years ago | Can you confirm that way/64045423
|
| 144805983 | about 2 years ago | If it's a road that also carries a public footpath (presumably using the bridge bit not the ford in the middle?) then leave the highway types as they are, and set the additional tag designation=public_footpath and change to foot=designated on the relevant ways. |
| 144805983 | about 2 years ago | Node dragged, and blocks vehicle access to about 6 properties, cannot be correct, reverted. |
| 144766223 | about 2 years ago | Some indication that full closure here is not in place, nothing matching on one.network. Based on your other changesets of the same type, this is reverted for now. |
| 144766664 | about 2 years ago | Reverted; I see you have even added notes on some of these roads that the way is open! This changeset is not acceptable for routing. If there are some ways genuinely totally closed for a long period (eg months) then identify them. |
| 144767135 | about 2 years ago | Reverted |
| 144766223 | about 2 years ago | Closed in both directions all the time? Doubtful |
| 144766664 | about 2 years ago | Are you sure that all the ways are blocked, all the time? |
| 144766755 | about 2 years ago | Item is "roadworks - delays unlikely", "no carriageway incursion" and only mentions Borrowdale Drive, not Croftholme Way - reverted |
| 144766892 | about 2 years ago | item is roadworks, not closure. reverting this. |
| 144767135 | about 2 years ago | This does not seem credible. Aren't the blue lines on one.network the diversion route, not a closure??? |
| 144768802 | about 2 years ago | The changeset comment is for describing what you changed and why, eg "add company name" "add industrial buildings" etc. The source field should be filled in stating your source. In this case, what website, exactly? |
| 144267200 | about 2 years ago | Looks from the history that the way was fine at vsn 17, and the problems have arisen by it being changed wrongly to highway=cycleway and then (by the same user) to =busway, both of which are wrong (busway does exclude all but bus). I'll put it back as it was to highway=service, foot=yes, bicycle=yes and the bollard (and way through it) can have motor_vehicle=permit to block everyone else. |
| 144539042 | about 2 years ago | Modification annulée - route en double ajoutée.
|
| 144539096 | about 2 years ago | Modification annulée - route en double ajoutée.
|