There are some major problems with this edit:

1) Indian Canyon Park does not exist except on paper. On the ground, every entrance sign, boundary marker, and trailhead map calls it part of Palisades Park.

2) The boundaries you have for "Indian Canyon Park" don't match either the on-the-ground boundaries or the county's land-ownership records.

3) "Rimrock Conservation Area" has a slightly greater degree of existence, in the form of a sign in an adjacent parking lot, but the boundaries you have don't quite match either the county's records or the on-the-ground evidence (though admittedly, the northwestern boundary is rather fuzzy on the ground).

And, as a lesser issue, is there a reason why you re-classified the trail between Trail 120 and Rimrock Drive as a path?

Are the trails you've added here based on actual GPS traces or on-the-ground observations? What you've drawn looks like the trails that *should* exist according to the county's maps, but when I visited earlier this year, I was unable to locate the trail leading from the parking area, and I didn't have time to go looking for any of the others.

Did you forget to add tags to this?

Are you sure "nature reserve" is the correct classification? When I was mapping the trails, I had to dodge cattle herds a few times -- not something I'd expect to do on a nature reserve.

Please pay attention when dealing with this sort of mis-tagged way. Yes, it was mis-tagged as a quarry. But it is also mis-tagged as a mineshaft, a ditch, a peak, and an incorrectly-named road.

When you come across an issue like this in the Inland Northwest area of the United States, there's usually more than one problem with the data. In this case, for example, way #13922679 was simultaneously tagged as a mine, a stream, and two different roads.

If the runway's still there but no longer in use, tagging it using one of the lifecycle prefixes such as "disused" or "abandoned" (osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) may be a better option.

Aerial imagery here shows something that looks an awful lot like a runway. Is there something I'm missing that says "Regan Ranch Airport" doesn't exist?

Why have you tagged the bank of the Spokane River as being a river in its own right?

The correct way to mark proposed roads is with the "proposed=residential" tag (proposed=*). There doesn't appear to be an easy way to do this with the iD editor, though.

Marking them as actual roads will lead to navigation software trying to route users down them ("In 300 feet, turn right onto Proposed").

I don't care what language is used for the contents of the "name" field, so long as 1) it's just a single language, 2) it's just a single name, and 3) the name reflects one of the things it's called.

I noticed you've named a few roads "Unconfirmed Rd". The "name" field shouldn't be used for anything except the name of the object. If you want to add a note that you're not sure a road exists, the best way is to add a "fixme=resurvey" ("Fix Me" from the "Add Field" dropdown in the iD editor). You may also want to change the road type to the generic "highway=road" (a road type of "Unknown Road" in iD).

Both of these options will flag the road for further investigation in various quality-assurance tools, something that a name change won't do.

Are you sure about the east-west runway here? In the latest Mapbox imagery, it looks like it may have been abandoned and re-vegetated.

Please don't make joke edits.

Unfortunately, Maps.Me is out of date. I did some basic mapping of the shopping mall there two months ago, including that Burger King; Maps.Me hasn't picked up the changes yet.

If you've got an address, opening hours, or similar information, feel free to add them and I'll integrate it with the existing data.

I'm not sure what you were trying to do, but I seriously doubt that the city limits of Speed, KS are a pipeline. I've reverted the change.

Thanks for confirming it.

Are the speed limits on Five Mile the result of an on-the-ground check? My experience is that roads out in the county are typically either 25 MPH or 35 MPH (or faster); 30 MPH is rare.

Is there a reason why you created this Value Village again?

This is the second time you've marked a castle where there clearly isn't one. Is there a reason for this?