Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

National forests are not "landuse=forest" under *any* of the many competing definitions of that tag. I've reverted this changeset.

Could you change how you go about expanding business nodes into building outlines? The way you're doing it right now, it loses information such as the address of the Shady Sprurce Hostel, or the fact that the Sinclair station sells diesel.

Is there a reason why you tagged a whole bunch of houses as offices, when they clearly aren't?

It looks like you used 'building:part=yes' on everything here. Was that an accident, or are you halfway through more-detailed mapping of them?

Please don't re-tag ordinary sidewalks as bicycle paths.

Welcome to OSM!

Adding "bicycle=designated" to a cycleway is redundant -- the "cycleway" tag itself means "a route designated for bicycle use".

Please, *please* don't use roads as the edges of a landuse multipolygon. It's going to make it very difficult to modify either the roads or the landuse, and if a standard for mapping roads as areas is ever developed, it'll make it impossible to draw proper road areas.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Did you know that you can quickly square up the corners of a building by hitting the "Q" key, or by right-clicking and selecting the "square" menu option?

"Living street" is pretty much a purely European concept. If you find yourself thinking of tagging something in the US as such, it's probably either a service road or a residential street.

My concern is things like Crooked Road (way/13834754) which appears to be a ten-mile-long Forest Service road, not a driveway.

All imagery I can find shows US-12/US-93 as two lanes each way with a center turn lane, not a divided road. Has that changed?

You've got some extremely long service roads here. Are you sure you've classified them correctly?

You've applied the "office" tag to a great many things that aren't offices. Is there a reason for that?

Hopefully you'll find fewer of my early crap map changes in the near future. I came across this while researching the 130+ named places in Spokane County. So far, I've been able to confirm the accuracy of just under half of them, and found clear errors in about a quarter.

(And the "Telido Station" development is looking very much like a "was" rather than an "is". The last mention in the Spokesman-Review was in 2008, the website went offline in 2016, and satellite imagery of the area shows no construction as of last month.)

Could you be a bit more careful when adding place names from USGS topo maps? "Tolido" isn't the name of an inhabited place, it's the name of a now-destroyed survey marker: https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_mark.prl?PidBox=SV1197

Has something changed in the past two years? The last time I visited the Folsom Farm site, the road leading there was still very much a dirt road.