OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
101168543 almost 5 years ago

Hello, thanks for adding the missing paths, I just edited in the area and noticed a few missing paths, but I didn't have any traces or information about them.
I suggest to be a little more careful with the merging of ways as they are separated because some segments are part of hiking routes while others are not, by merging them you introduce them all to the hiking route and this may not be true. I see that after your edits the yellow dot route (Chiril-Gemenea) has a branch to the peaks; red stripe, yellow triangle, red triangle and yellow cross routes have a lot of branches in the Pietrele Doamnei area (I am sure that this is not the case due to personal survey). Also red dot is both on pathways and on forestry track. Please take this into consideration when you are further editing as those errors can be fatal for anybody hiking in the area.

100798243 almost 5 years ago

Am găsit problema. A rămas pe bretea un tag construction=primary. Se pare că OSRM ignoră segmentele cu construction.
Pentru a putea face debug, OSRM are o pagină de demo pe care poți vedea calculele interne ale motorului de rutare: https://map.project-osrm.org/debug/

98596381 almost 5 years ago

Hello, I see that in this edit you have removed a part of the cyclepath to model the service way. Do you have local knowledge of the area? Unfortunately it's impossible to me to give a ground survey at the time and I would very much like some local information. According to pictures that I saw in the media of the cyclepath and to satellite imagery I am almost certain that this is the location of it and it is not really suitable for car traffic (similar to a sidewalk in specifications)

100189141 almost 5 years ago

Hello, thanks for your editing of OSM. I want to mention a common mistake that I have observed in all your edits, instead of giving names to existing roads you are creating new overlapping roads above the ones already in place.

I would suggest that you should simply just select the road that you want to modify and add a name to it, no need to retrace it.
Thanks.

100181044 almost 5 years ago

Hello Arpad,
You have made a mistake in this set of modification, instead of adding addr:city=Misentea, you put building=Misentea, which is an invalid tag :)

99899956 almost 5 years ago

Hello, thanks for editing the map, keep on going!
One indication, take a look at road classifications (highway=*) secondary is used for roads linking regions (drumuri județene) this street is better classified as residential. Thanks

99887236 almost 5 years ago

Hello, on the road markers (borne rutiere) it is signed as "Varianta de Ocolire Cluj-Est" short variant - VOCE. You can also check the official classification in the law (Annex A from HG 540 from 22/06/2000) http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/222910 where you can see that the entire road is DNVOCE. Please revert the change.

99857402 almost 5 years ago

Hello, thanks for editing OSM and good luck!
Is the new bridge open to traffic? If yes, what is the status of the old bridge? Was is converted to pedestrian only or it will be demolished?

99741851 almost 5 years ago

Salut.
Care dintre clădirile adăugate de tine este grădinița? Pune te rog tag la clădire building=kindergarten.

De asemenea în alt changeset ai șters areal școlii. De ce ai făcut asta?

99524488 almost 5 years ago

Hello mihaiov. Did they install physical barriers between the traffic directions? Usually separating the road is done only when this is the case.

99511124 almost 5 years ago

Hello, thanks for editing OSM. I hope it will help customers find your service easier! I also did some editing in the area and added further details. Just a little observation, it's enough to put the information on a single feature, be it node, building or area, to avoid duplication errors. For your case I moved all information about the car service to the yard outline and left the building tagging simple. Good luck on further editing.

99167651 almost 5 years ago

Salut, câteva observații:
Alfa, nu Alba.
Trage 6 Vânători mai la dreapta, pe Calea 6 Vânători.
Aurel Vlaicu mai către UTA, în zona de blocuri, zona de case unde e pus acuma punctul e cartierul Gai.

99111720 almost 5 years ago

Hey Armin, to me they look really similar to housenumbers. Often in villages numbering is done consecutively and not based on street, also I saw some houses that have derived numbering, like 42/D, which means it is a newer house.

Because of this, I think it is meant to be the address of each house. You can ask @gisbihor as he added them 8 years ago.

On a previous changeset I saw that you deleted those tags, can you please revert them? I don't want to revert your whole changeset as you also made some important changes to road infrastructure in that one.

99112330 almost 5 years ago

Welcome to editing on OSM, we are happy to have you here.
What did you try to do in this changeset? I can see that you have moved some existing addresses from the correct places to the middle of the street. I think that this is probably a mistake, I can help you if you need.

87518349 almost 5 years ago

Am refăcutelementele șterse în acest changeset. Dacă sunt drumuri/parcări private există tag care specifică accesul, nu înseamnă că trebuiesc șterse.

99105489 almost 5 years ago

Salut, îți mulțumim pentru contribuție.

Am dat și eu un ochi asupra zonei, am reparat câteva greșeli minori de la chagesetul tău (au rămas agățate câteva noduri) și am adăugat tronsonul cu strada trandafirilor conform descrierii tale.

Referitor la linkul pus, îți recomand să nu folosești alte hărți pentru a edita pe OSM, sunt protejate de drepturi de autor și nu e tocmai legal. Aici nu consider a fi o problemă deoarece pari a cunoaște situația de pe teren și probabil harta ai pus-o drept exemplificare grafică...

97573401 almost 5 years ago

Salut, mă bucur că ai făcut primul tău edit pe OSM, baftă în continuare și la cât mai multe altele.
Ca o sugestie pentru editările viitoare, adăugarea unui obiect doar prin descriere nu este o practică tocmai corectă. Am adăugat niște completări clopotului pentru a putea fi interpretat corect. Te rog folosește preseturile din iD sau caută pe OSM wiki despre metoda corectă de tagging (spre exemplu amenity=recycling).

97379634 almost 5 years ago

I understand it now. Good job, keep on mapping! PS I made a minor change - I put the old name into a separate tag, just a personal preference, it wasn't necessarily a mistake.

97379634 almost 5 years ago

Hello, simplifying the building names was a correct move. But I suggest leaving the residential area name as "Apollo Nord" (of course, if the apartment buildings are still known like this).
Currently the name doesn't appear on the map anymore as cannot be found.

96863711 almost 5 years ago

De la giratoriu cu centura la Calea Aviatorilor se numește Strada Hella. Așa apare pe indicatoare, pe hărțile oficiale și în adresele Hella și TNT.