Hello 1T_money,

Splitting ways to make them shorter literally serves no purpose unless you are editing the area and the way you are editing becomes over 2000 nodes long.

You have caused an inconvenience to me because I have a lot of unpublished changes in this area and I got one big conflict because of this.

Please reconsider this next time.

Thank you, BubbaJuice

Hello 1T_money,

Splitting ways to make them shorter literally serves no purpose unless you are editing the area and the way you are editing becomes over 2000 nodes long.

You have caused an inconvenience to me because I have a lot of unpublished changes in this area and I got one big conflict because of this.

Please reconsider this next time.

Thank you, BubbaJuice

Please do not tag buildings as street lamps as you did so here: node/9213149506

You can use a note as a placeholder. They can be created on the right hand side of the page at openstreetmap.org. You should resolve them once you are done using the note as a placeholder though.

Hello wombatmaper,

You did not do this task correctly. The task description states "Convert reservoir nodes in Arizona to areas tagged natural=water + water=reservoir" when you simply just converted a node to updated tagging.

Please copy the tags from this node to the reservoir imported by NHD not far north east of this node please. If you are interested, the number two tank nodes goes to the tank even farther northeast.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Hello GREGMAP1,

In this changeset you added buildings that were not traced exactly on the buildings that were shown on Bing aerial imagery. Could you align all of your buildings with Bing aerial imagery? How you would do this is have Bing aerial imagery selected in the iD editor and then use the area tool to trace around the exact edge of the building until it reflected the exact area around the building. You would not lazily trace the outside of the building. After this could you press "q" to square the building? This will allow for accurate buildings that reflect the real world.

Regarding the park nodes you have added in this changeset, what are the purpose of these? Why did you add them? Why are they named "1", "2", and "3"? Why have you added nodes like these all across Tucson?

A response would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Hey GREGMAP1,

In this changeset you added some highway links to intersections. Some of these highway links should be removed though. This is because these roads should only be created if physical separation is present (ie. a median or bollards). However the ones that you added only have strips of paint indicating lanes. Therefore they should be deleted.

If you could leave a comment saying that you got this message that would be great.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

Hey GREGMAP1,

The street lamps you added in this changeset should not be tagged with man_made=mast as they are typical street lamps and not masts. This also implies that tower:type=lighting should be removed. If you could do this on all of your most recent changesets that would be great.
Please read about both of these tags to have a good understanding of them. tower:type=lighting
man_made=mast
highway=street_lamp

If you could lave a response to confirm you got this message that would be great.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

Hey MojaveNC,
The polygons you made in this changeset are very low quality. Much of the area they cover isn't even forest but is shrubland (scrub). That is why I think they should be deleted. A follow up response if you agree or disagree with me would be appreciated.
Thanks.

Hey martinmatejek,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I am contacting you because the websites you are adding to these hotels are not correct. booking.com links are not correct because it is not the hotel's official website, but simply a way to rent a spot at a hotel. Points of Interest like hotels should have the website as their official website. For example, in the hotel you edited in this changeset the website should have been https://midamcorp.com/hotels/apcap, the hotel's official website.

Thanks, BubbaJuice

*Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta

Didn't link the changeset: changeset/99411849

Hi they,

Here was the brief discussion I had about this on one of the changesets that changed the tags. There was also discussion about it in #local-arizona in the OSM US Slack. (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CF9G71Y4B/p1615931124000900)

*On site map

So I am assuming more insulators = higher voltage?

I was more wondering about the voltage value. Can you determine it from the type of wire? Or can you determine it from a high quality aerial image?

Hi bahnpirat,

I was wondering where you were getting your information for the power lines here from. For example, this power line: way/177188056

Thanks in advance,
BubbaJuice

Hey GREGMAP1,

I saw a lot of your edits in Tucson. Thanks for adding all of the buildings. That sort of thing is important. I see you used iD. Did you know that if you press "q" it will make the buildings all right angled. If you could try that next time that would be great. Also, I would appreciate it a lot if you start using Bing Aerial Imagery for your houses. It is much better quality than the imagery you are currently using and would greatly improve the accuracy of the data. If you have any other questions, feel free to reach out & ask me.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Sorry the bbox is so big. I accidentally downloaded an area in JOSM and didn't modify it but it still was in the changeset. My apologies.

Hey tekim,
I am on a road trip so that it how I surveyed all of the locations I edited. I use the app StreetComplete which is a surveying app for OpenStreetMap data. All of the edited locations have been manually checked by me, in person. As for the large bounding box of the changeset I wish I could have made it smaller but the app does not have that when uploading data. For more information on the app you can read their wiki page: osm.wiki/StreetComplete

Thanks.