Back to comp again. I can see that you applied the change. Thanks!

I'm AFK at the moment, as soon as I get back I will remove it, or feel free to do that.

FYI: Added approximate way (947856099) and made a new relation (12764972).

Cool! Thanks!

I'll do that. Thank you once again for your time.

So to add a new way for the boundary rather than use the existing residential area?

If so, please confirm and I will do as agreed.

So just to make sure what do you propose here?

I would create a new relation and include residential area as a polygon, but this node (1791553385) would be an admin_center. Does that make sense for you?

PS, Thank you for being so responsive!

This makes us a problem since it is the capital city. I residential area isn't an administrative boundary, but we have to have something for the capital. Does that make sense?

Are you okay if I convert node+residential area into relation?

Thanks for the clarification.

Hello Fran!

May you please explain why you have moved everything to a point when this one also was a regular one?

Thanks & sve najblje,
Nemanja

Hvala ti na odgovoru. Revertovaću moju promenu jer sam prvo promenio smer, a zatim sam proverio istoriju, pa sam video da si to promenio.

Još jednom hvala na brzoj reakciji!

Zdravo,

Samo da proverim da li je ova izmena za jednosmernost ispravna, jer sve što je trenutno na mapillary-ju ukazuje da je jednosmerna ulica u obrnutom smeru. Molim za potvrdu.

Sjajno! Hvala još jednom!

Mislim da je razmera u redu, siguran sam da me bunila ta druga polovina crteža. Tako da, ukoliko je moguće da te zamolim ili da uradiš sa building partovima, ili da razdvojiš na dva zasebna objekta.

Ponovo ti hvala na brzim odgvorima,
Nemanja

Ćao Aleksa! Nadam se da si dobro u ovim kriznim vremenima.

Hteo sam da te pitam, da li je oblik (shape) Kule Beograd dobar, jer mi se čini da je prevelik i da je oblik drugačiji. Molim te ako možeš da proveriš još jednom, bio bih ti zahvalan.

way id: 670824807.

Sve najbolje,
Nemanja

It'll be on my radar in the next few days. Thanks!

Thank you for the prompt reply!
If you go to https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34633854 it says that building:part is removed by your changeset/102939137, but once I have double checked it was building:part=yes, instead =no.
It seems to be okay now, once it is removed a building:part tag.

Thank you,
Nemanja

Hi,

I can see that you have changed this building.
If we leave as you did, Empire State Building will become a big box, instead of a nice 3D building. You have removed also the building:part=no, even it is not a part of the building. If you are not 100% sure how it looks now, please go to https://osmbuildings.org/ and look for this building.

Thanks,
Nemanja

Hello! Thank you for your contact.
There are many building parts which are making correct shape of the Empire State Building.
Please go to osmbuildings.org to see how it looks in 3D.

Best Regards,
Nemanja