Thank you for confirming and fixing the issue.

Yeah, I agree. It was really hard to find any sort of classification for these buildings. If you have a way to note that it’s a warehouse or billiards room or other community entertainment room, I’d like to hear it.

Thanks. I’ll keep that in mind for the future. This building is a small 2 story building, and the labels would definitely overlay each other if put to the most precise location. In some of the other business locations that I fixed, some of the original locations seemed to be placed in a way due to the desire to show the label from a distance and not crowded out on the screen. I tried to get those close to the right location without crowding out the other businesses.

The KeepRight Issues in the Open Street Map Data showed me that exact message, and I marked it as fixed today. The Wiki page from abutters=* says, "This could be used for rendering if landuse=* area information is not available." So it seems to be saying that landuse around the road should be used instead of marking the road itself as abutters. Perhaps it's not deprecated, but it seems to be discouraged in this kind of scenario.

I reverted the change. The property maps do list SCVWD as the owners of the parcels in the creek. So this change wasn't "wrong", but also the properties do list the parcels being split between San Jose and Campbell. So it wasn't completely correct either.

Thanks, based on further review of the maps on https://santaclaralafco.org/resources/maps, I see that there is a more precise definition of parcels and boundaries. Though the previous location from a few days ago was *also incorrect*. So I'll revert this change soon, and reorient it to what is provided by that LAFCO website.

The previous boundary contradicts with San Jose's GIS Open Data at https://gisdata-csj.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/CSJ::city-council-districts-2011-archive/explore?location=37.277603%2C-121.975624%2C18.00

So how do we resolve this contradiction? San Jose's own website says that it's north of the creek and not south of the creek.