Bexhill-OSM's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175466221 | 17 days ago | These updates are great, thanks! The 'on' shouldn't be capitalised though :)
|
| 172319017 | 2 months ago | Hi Chris,
|
| 173225598 | 2 months ago | I agree with you, not sure why user UtterCutter changed to Saint. Having driven this road it is definitely labelled St. Francis Farm. Thanks. |
| 173052397 | 2 months ago | Thanks for updating the dentist closure, you dropped the building tag so I've restored that back. Cheers, Alex |
| 173052776 | 2 months ago | Thanks. A useful bit of history, I recognise Meads name from the Wilton Court Hotel he also funded. |
| 172319017 | 3 months ago | Hey Canalsman, I hope you don't mind but I've changed the following tags:
|
| 170665229 | 4 months ago | Heh, sorry I didn't mean to insinuate anything or be so blunt in my question. I have been using the contact prefix for everything in Bexhill and just wondered if I was acting misguided, thanks. |
| 170665229 | 4 months ago | Hi, I am curious - what is wrong with using the 'contact:website' tagging scheme? |
| 148457263 | 4 months ago | Hey Thingummy, the lighthouse base has been completely removed now. What's the best course of action, delete the whole way?
|
| 168839500 | 5 months ago | Hi again. This 'shop' is not verifiable by anyone visiting the location.
|
| 168236426 | 6 months ago | No problem, I can revert those changes for you.
|
| 168236426 | 6 months ago | Hello there. I know this to be a residential property. It is best only map company's that have a publicly visitable address, otherwise it is seen as advertising and should not be included on OSM. Thanks, Alex |
| 166886567 | 7 months ago | No problem! Many such cases... :) |
| 166886567 | 7 months ago | I will amend these so they are entrance nodes as described here - addr:flats=*.
|
| 164872833 | 8 months ago | Ah very nice... I did start this, but you must have a more automated way of tagging :) |
| 160719274 | 12 months ago | Just a heads up that Bexhill is (mostly) aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels. Bing is slightly unaligned here. |
| 160651494 | 12 months ago | FYI the name St. Andrews Place is already tagged as the addr:housename. I've added the tags "amenity:1900-2011=place_of_worship" and "building:1900-2011=church" for better clarity. |
| 160519476 | 12 months ago | Thanks! If you know any other postcodes feel free to add them :) |
| 159600522 | about 1 year ago | Thanks. Sometimes JOSM doesn't flag these geometry issues. Is there a tool I can use to check for intersecting ways? |
| 159376011 | about 1 year ago | Thanks for adding those missing houses. I have learnt the road is called is called 'Rohan Ascent', would you happen to know why? |