What gives? Have you recently been on this road? It's still very much under construction and OklaDOT is still asking people to avoid it.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/82113662 where the changeset comment is: Problem exists with Tesla not OSM, reverting Tesla-specific edit that doesn't reflect ground truth.

Yeah, looking at it now, it looks like the mapping is now bugged. If that fixed your Tesla, the map should still be fixed to match reality and you need to work with Tesla to fix a bug on their side.

I might also recommend doublechecking with Tesla on this one before going for that, there's no reason it shouldn't be able to handle the way it's mapped now.

OK, I doublechecked it against Mapillary imagery from January to confirm and updated based on what I saw.

Also looking at this more and working knowledge of how interstates work, I'm thinking 605 departs from 405, not 22, and the ramps between 22 and 605 are just ramps?

Yeah, I think we were trying to solve the same problem. If you open in Id and have the background set to Bing, does that imagery match what you're seeing on the ground? I honestly only go through that interchange maybe once or twice every ten years myself since I moved away.

Basically, I'm trying to work out how the south end of the HOV ramps end because it's causing problems for navigation systems if it's starting earlier than exists in reality.

Also looks like you were trying to mitigate a lane change restriction by extending the ramp... there's change:lanes for that, which is what I had going on there.

Also is the ramp for the HOV lanes on the left just west of 23 really starting much farther south as you put it now, compared to where it's located on the Bing imagery where I put it?

Please mind the placement tags as well, placement=* tags indicate where on the roadway the way tag is landing along it. placement=transition indicates where a lane is departing from the start of the gore painted on the road (like, literally next to it) and ends at the start of the ramp. Also looks like some turn lanes on the approach to exit 23 was wiped out.

If you're working on lanes, id is probably not a good editor right now due to the lack of visualization for this information, which is consumed by navigation systems.

Is exit 23 really one lane now?

Please pay attention to the placement=* tags and other lane tagging; you moved some ramps so the lanes no longer line up properly.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/81892011 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of edit that largely ignored lane tagging, tunnel versus bridge, and other difficult to resolve, significant reductions in level of detail.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/81891682 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of edit that largely ignored lane tagging, tunnel versus bridge, and other difficult to resolve, significant reductions in level of detail.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/81891227 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of edit that largely ignored lane tagging, tunnel versus bridge, and other difficult to resolve, significant reductions in level of detail.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/81803899 where the changeset comment is: Multiple ramps changed without regard to geometry, lane placement or lane tagging.

Looks like you extended the onramp from MacArthur Boulevard *well* past the end of the ramp. Please pay attention to lane tagging and placement=transition tags.

Yup, fortunately a nonroutable error at least. Not sure how I managed to pull that one off without noticing.

👍

Thanks buddy!

Please use caution regarding lane tagging, the placement=transition segments intentionally start at the painted gore and end at the physical gore to assist in lane guidance.