OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
58938493 over 7 years ago

No problem. JOSM has a really solid, but basic, editor for it, and for more advanced tagging (or generating for iD), there's http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=&lat=35.4431555&lon=-97.3440731&mode=2 and another handy tool for generating opening_hours at http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

58938493 over 7 years ago

opening_hours=05:00-22:00 works for the hours.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58938493

58914789 over 7 years ago

place=neighbourhood

58914789 over 7 years ago

These might be good to update as administrative areas replacing the landuse tagging as well (I know you weren't the one who tagged them as landuse)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58914789

58907111 over 7 years ago

Was able to get better alignment with the Digital Globe Premium Imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58907111

58777230 over 7 years ago

Well, mybad. The bollards at the end of the way approaching from the south looked like the setup for a bike cut through. Nice catch!

58794862 over 7 years ago

Hi there!

Thanks for your interest in OpenStreetMap. If you're interested in helping improve the map, feel free to ask for help. If you're looking to just draw on a map, OpenGeoFiction may be a more appropriate venue.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58794862

57255675 over 7 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/58803893 where the changeset comment is: Removing apparent experimental edit.

58794862 over 7 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/58803843 where the changeset comment is: Removing apparent experimental edit.

58777230 over 7 years ago

Whoops that was probably me. I take it you got better knowledge of that spot?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58777230

58721121 over 7 years ago

I don't think a full revert is necessary in a lot of cases. Parks tend to be paths, but I think most people would lean towards connections to picnic spots and playgrounds to be footways (but not sidewalks; those are the footway next to a vehicular way like a street or cycleway).

58721121 over 7 years ago

Sure, basically, if it only allows foot traffic or designed only for foot traffic, it's highway=footway (add bicycle=yes if bicycles are allowed). If it's designed as a multiuse path, it's highway=path. If it's a cycleway (biggest way to tell that this is the case is if it has signage and/or pavement markings), then highway=cycleway (and add foot=yes if pedestrians are allowed).

58734853 over 7 years ago

I changed this over to shop=charity, which seems to be a better fit for thrift shops.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58734853

58721121 over 7 years ago

The park path looks good now, but the sidewalk would qualify as a footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58721121

58698729 over 7 years ago

footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58698729

58698171 over 7 years ago

footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58698171

58666415 over 7 years ago

Footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58666415

58666069 over 7 years ago

footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58666069

58664989 over 7 years ago

footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58664989

58658431 over 7 years ago

footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58658431