You can put the address on the building it applies to. Your node also appears in the middle of a road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175942730

Abbreviations shouldn't be used in refs. "I 42 FUT" should be "I 42 Future".

Actually using your eyes to look where the culvert is instead of blindly accepting id's suggestion is highly recommended. You're a professional mapper, please act accordingly.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175837001

A bit more about the goal of the changeset instead of just the name of the city it's in is appreciated.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175772609

The shop should be located at the office, usually a node unless outline is known.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175737646

Awesome!

This seems highly unlikely that a few miles of the Washita River were moved into a culvert.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175699721

These name=* values should probably be ref=* instead
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175690295

This camera appears to have been placed on the map in the middle of a driveway. What's this camera mounted on?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175675063

This hydrant appears to be mapped in the middle of a cycleway. Where is it actually?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175630638

What's this camera mounted on? Currently on the map it's positioned in the middle of a driveway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175607406

What's this camera mounted on? Looks like the initial placement on the map is in the middle of a street.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175607343

What's this camera mounted on? Looks like the node was inadvertently placed in the middle of a parking aisle.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175607290

Is this bicycle=no because of an actual rule or law?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175599411

If you hadn't tuned out of the thread immediately, you'd have noticed that the general majority landed on there's no reason to remove them, and they are useful for data consumers.

It's more like the validator doesn't really highlight that error very well.

I'd assume that NHX=yes is an accidental typo of NHS=yes based on context.

Aah. Yeah, row buildings can be hard to tell apart sometime. A good context clue in the US and western Canada (especially railroad boom towns like this one built ~1880-1930) is that the tightest density tends to be near the railroad tracks, and streets named Front, Railroad, Main or similar, and the main drag is probably a terrace of row buildings.

Also 15 years ago...wow, that would have been one of my earliest Oklahoma edits...

These were metric conversions because at the time I didn't know the correct notation for legacy units typically posted instead of meters here.