OK, left the geometry you provided, did reset the names

Names are not refs. And in some cases it appears that you have actually replaced a valid name with a ref on US 56, even though the name is cited. We should probably revert this...

Does OSU count as it's own village?

Unless bicycles are not allowed or not discouraged (as is the case with sidewalks), it should be highway=path

OK, I think this might have been overzealous. I see this removed Node: 4897994740, which I had fixed.

OK. Were any of those in Oklahoma east of I 35? I know I worked on conflating some of those with existing data.

Is this in regards to the DACGroup edits?

Moved it to approximately the correct location based on surrounding addresses. Please check your tagging.

This is obviously in a neighborhood.

amenity=Furniture Store isn't a thing. shop=furniture is.

loc_name is also unnecessary.

Killing me here...this node wasn't even over the correct store. Opening hours is also formatted incorrectly, and phone numbers missing the seperators... don't use abbreviations...

This one, too... kinda feeling like you might want to hire someone actually experienced in dealing with OpenStreetMap.

You may want to review the tagging conventions. I've fixed this one but maybe check to see if the object exists first, and don't invent new tags like amenity=Family Restaurant and using abbreviations like Ave and NW...

Village boundary? I don't follow what's going on here...

Could we get a more descriptive summary in the changeset titles?

I see a new development there on Mapbox imagery, but this doesn't line up with that. If you have local knowledge of the area, would you take another look?

Heck, I see now I screwed up adding a Sprouts as a POI when someone made it as an area just across the street.

Don't sweat it, mistakes happen, I make 'em regularly. Don't give up, we all gain experience with time!

This changeset should be reverted, those gas bars are definitely there.