Could be broken down a little more precisely. Check out the landuse work around Colony, OK for some examples.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163218281

Looks like that would be street_side. If that space is a travel lane when cars aren't parked in it, then it'd be lane.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163217273

You're looking for capacity:disabled=1
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163187805

The name should only be the name. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Please consider lifecycle tags. osm.wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts
Street names shouldn't contain abbreviations.
access=yes means anybody can use it at any time without restriction, which isn't the case with Tesla.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163186306

Yeah, you're right. I forgot to swap the tag as I drew north and you are correct at the location of the split.

When a value is unknown, it's best not to set the key. No operator tag would suggest that the operator is not known, but operator=unknown suggests the operator is named "unknown".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163141557

True, though the spirit of "don't map for the renderer" is also "don't break it" since the only real difference between forest service networks and non forest service networks is the network. That's where my head's at on it at least.

Fair enough, though I'm not sure that really went anywhere in practice and could be a bit of a "don't break the renderer" moment? I'm certainly on team semicolon when multiple refs apply (though ultimately I think this information doesn't belong on the way, it belongs on the route relation).

All three just use "ref=", nothing even consumes ref:usfs or ref:blm...I was on that thread.

Road refs should use ref=* regardless of network. Also you straight up deleted some refs without replacing them with another tag. There's some good stuff here but this might need a do-over.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163063568

You can save yourself some overtracing by using multipolygons.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163057570

asphalt sidewalks?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162956384

Spelling out "Place" instead of "Pl" is good since computers can't tell if that's supposed to be Place or Plaza, but can abbreviate both easily.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162952814

If you need branch information displayed on your rendering, change your renderer, not the map. Branch information does not belong in the name tag, only the name does.

changeset/162973876

We use "West" and "Street" instead, because computers are good at creating abbreviations when needed but doesn't know "Street" from "Saint" from "Sainte".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162885123

The name needs to only be the name, not branch information, as previously indicated.

changeset/162644960

The name needs to only be the name, not branch information, as previously indicated.

changeset/162644960

Take another look for a better way to tag that.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162576129

Please don't add branch location to the name, that's what the branch=* tag is for. Name is only the name, branch is only the branch.

changeset/162587000

Does the parking garage actually have a name? If not that seems more like a description than a name value.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162411031