Please be mindful of moving geometry when placement tags are in play, this shifted the entire highway over by two lanes to the south.

Might consider squaring up the corners...JOSM makes short work of this but I'm pretty sure there's a way in iD as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127804520

Turn lanes should be tagged on the way they're belonging to and not as a separate way. You'll probably need JOSM instead of iD to do this effectively.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127823726

Proprietary sources are generally prohibited due to licensing; please provide specifics.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127870676

Was this meant to add a kilometers-long culvert?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127905101

Kinda seeing the Durant Bypass as more of an aspirational motorway given that a decent chunk of it's still single carriageway. Thinking maybe highway=trunk, expressway=yes is probably better on the dual carriageway, no?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127906863

US 81 is mostly what I was working on in this changeset, this particular one getting details around Enid (lanes in particular) updated.

Might I ask why this is drawing hostility now after I've been working on lanes for basically a decade at this point?

Good thing to do in general for sidewalks along roads since it helps out blind people using navigation apps.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127074169

I updated the tags on this to match tagging a little more typical of the rest of the map based on the information available.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127082395

Cleaned up a bit of a tagging trainwreck here since a lot of those tags belong to the museum and the ship is not a building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126659757

Please actually adjust the geometry to match the buildings; don't just blindly copy over from MapWithAI.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126757861

This is probably more likely ref=CR E0560.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126687946

E0560 sounds like the more likely name...probably should be ref=CR E0560 since it's presumably 56 miles south of the Kansas border and not 560.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126704809

Already tagged as a path. name removed. Width seems too small since it's about as wide as as a car. Contact the makers of the program that's giving bad directions since they shouldn't be trying to route cars down a path to start with.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126712838

Fixed it up for ya, since you tagged something not a bridge as a bridge, while missing the bridge itself. Also definitely not just 1 meter wide, 1 meter is about the distance from your belt to the floor standing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126714466

lanes probably isn't worth tagging on this one if the lanes aren't delineated; probably should be "noname=yes" and "ref=CR 2976"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126473738

This one-way probably applies to the entire parking aisle through the Whataburger lot.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123344143

Oof, OK, I'll try to track down what happened. Super not a fan of Oklahoma's annexation rules that make for extraordinarily fiddly work. I'm trying to get it cleaned up around my area since it's *baaad* and not something that most people can do without having some idea how boundaries here work and looking at the public data...

When bringing in buildings from Map With AI, please adjust the footprints to actually match what's on the ground. If the data was already high quality, the whole dataset would have been mass imported long ago.

Just a heads up, it's not necessary nor desirable to duplicate ref=* information in name=*. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only