Not bad for a first edit.
Take a look at https://osmcha.org/changesets/83719853 for a comparison, I think that's what you were going for.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83502783

Smaller changesets of more limited geographic scope are much easier to QA than ones covering a wide geographic scope such as entire continents and oceans.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83556856

A bit more attention to detail would be appreciated. Compare this changeset to changeset/83718504 if you would. Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83702697

I've gone through and updated the tracing a bit to better reflect what's on the ground in changeset/792906022.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83706854

Not bad, but not great, either. Be detail oriented when it comes to providing geometry. Also, avoid abbreviations in addresses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83646446

Not sure what the point was in removing service=driveway on a driveway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83654960

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/83653565 where the changeset comment is: Spam removal.

For addr:unit you can just put "C". Otherwise not a bad first edit. Welcome!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83338207

I wouldn't consider that accurate lane tagging then.

Is this two lanes the whole way? Or are exit and turn lanes missing?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83085149

Seems like some of these aren't really name so much as a description...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83084184

Not bad. Not great, either. I cleaned it up a bit more based on bing imagery and local knowledge to better reflect what appears to be on the ground. I'll probably survey it at some point after I get a truck again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82679182

Looks like you messed up the ramps at Lewis in this edit...use change:lanes=* and turn:lanes=* instead of mapping lane restrictions as seperate ways.

Looks like a sidewak leading from a driveway into a building.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82325080

Please provide informative changeset comments and limit your area geographically.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82311758

Not sure where you're getting a rounded corner out of a T intersection.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82298552

This driveway, which is obviously a truck scale, goes through the truck scale wall??
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82284884

For purposes of mapping in OSM, the gore location is the start of the neutral zone, not the start of the channelizing line. For the channelizing line, that's what the change:lanes=* tagging is for.

placement=transition
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/change

OK, apparently we're not on the same page here. Is it just the layer=* tags that are wrong or is there something else?

yes, I understand that. I'm starting to wonder if you know what splitting a way is? It takes one way, and creates two ways, so you can have different tags on different sections of road to describe what's going on...