OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
69801024 over 6 years ago

What is even going on here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69801024

69565394 over 6 years ago

Yeah, did you need help backing out of it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69565394

69474018 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69787427 where the changeset comment is: Reverting SEO spam.

69434879 over 6 years ago

Kinda looks like landuse=residential still applies as well, then, no?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69434879

18980673 over 6 years ago

I really think that page was developed in a vacuum and doesn't agree with how routes are handled elsewhere in the map. Maintainability is greatly diminished by using cardinals as roles on ways instead of forward/backward and (if the relation ends on a dual carriageway on one or both ends) one relation per direction with the relation tagged direction=cardinal

69438569 over 6 years ago

I intended to get more up to date speed limits from OpenStreetCam, but fell asleep.

18980673 over 6 years ago

This was a bad change. The only relevant roles for ways in a route relation are empty, forward and backward. The only time east, west, north or south should come up as a role is in superrelations for subrelations.

69229120 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69292282 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.

69202224 over 6 years ago

This is obviously a private residence.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69202224

69199484 over 6 years ago

Not sure which building this belongs to but I definitely question the copyright of the geocoder used.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69199484

69190266 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69252115 where the changeset comment is: Removing vandalism (profanity tagging).

69180401 over 6 years ago

Which imagery were you using?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69180401

69158146 over 6 years ago

Names are not descriptions, but I updated the tagging for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69158146

69157052 over 6 years ago

Fixed the tagging on that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69157052

69144589 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69218972 where the changeset comment is: Reverting SEO spam.

69007080 over 6 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/69027991 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.

68860083 over 6 years ago

Some useful changeset comments would help with QA.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68860083

68876347 over 6 years ago

You're kinder to spammers with questionable geocoding sources than i am.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68876347

68713384 over 6 years ago

You can leave off all the access tags there, highway=footway already implies foot=yes and all other modes no.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68713384

68797795 over 6 years ago

This should probably be ref=CR S4112 and noname=yes in that case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68797795