I'm not 100% sure what the goal was here, but I did notice that a bridge got extended and lane tagging got merged when two ways were merged. Also please avoid oneway=-1 except as a last resort when the way (for whatever reason) has to be reversed as a dependency on something else (very rare).
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56616778

No problem, thanks for being open on this. Last time there was someone who went a little too strict with the tagging, we ended up with the entire US highway system tagged trunk nationwide

I still have some concerns about this mass attempt at priority creep on the highway=* tag. osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#Secondary_tag

osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#Tertiary_highways

"Use highway=trunk for high performance or high importance roads that don't meet the requirement for motorway."

Yeah, that actually looks like trunk is the correct tag for this segment, not primary.

> State highways and US highways in Texas are often built to the same standards and are otherwise indistinguishable.

That's fairly typically the case everywhere.

> I don't see a convincing case for why similarly-built highways in Texas should have different designations just based on their status as a US or a state highway. It's not "inflated"

The US system is designed and intended for long distance travel, the state routes are generally intended for town-to-town intrastate trips.

Granted, this is largely bikeshedding given how few options there are available to navigate in the American west, but staying consistent with the majority of states would be a good idea, no need to creep it upwards, particularly with trunk and motorway being special cases above primary.

My concern would be parity with surrounding states. Typically speaking, state highways default to highway=secondary unless there's additional capacity, and highway=primary would be a US highway, and a highway=tertiary being pretty much anything with a centerline at lower levels or state auxiliary levels. Defaulting state highways to primary would give an inflated sense of what highways are in Texas versus everyone else.

You're projecting, as usual, in order to reject reality.

Generally FM/RM roads would be tertiary. Maybe higher if it's a big multilane boulevard in a city or something like that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56508945

Looks like a lot of pretty clearcut secondaries got upgraded to primary here. Generally speaking, a two lane rural state highway would be a secondary (primary primary if it's a four lane undivided or a major street in a city), and auxiliary state highways would be a secondary or tertiary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56504627

I'm not quite sure why these tags were removed regarding the proposed ramps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56503465

But, the name of the ROUTE is not what is in question here, it's the name of the ROAD.

Sure, the wayfinding signs for the *ROUTE* say that, as a legacy of being one of the few routes in the state that have a name instead of a number, and one of an even smaller subset that have both. Most highways don't have wayfinding signs for the name of the ROAD here.

I don't think so. Again, it's still signed as the road being Liberty Parkway and the route as Creek Turnpike.

Timeline for how this was developed is this:

* Highway was built as an unnumbered route, with Creek Turnpike route shields.
* State renames this segment as Liberty Parkway; route name remains Creek Turnpike.
* Broken Arrow builds the Liberty Parkway Trail, named after the highway.
* State assigns the route OK 364, Creek Turnpike shields being phased out.
* Wayfinding signs for the *route* still read Creek Turnpike.
* Name signs for this segment still say Liberty Parkway.

Did that farmer's field shrink or is it the industrial looking thing at the end of the road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56506680

Does 2 South SHerwood Avenue only apply to that building or all four in the complex? What's the name of the complex, since "Home" seems unlikely? What city is this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56480576

Nicely done!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56491320

Got it from context, was a good start, but a swing and a miss. Take a look now.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56491717

You have reintroduced your vandalism, not reverted it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56483844

If you can't deal with this change, I suggest committing it to opengeofiction or only using a snapshot from before the legislature renamed the road.

That's the name of the route, not the name of the road.