I'm not entirely sure what the goal or the point was here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174608641

This appears to be in an intersection; usually Flock cameras are mounted on vertical poles.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174575732

"Added houses" would be a better changeset comment.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174531665

This camera location appears to be inside an IHOP. This likely isn't right.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174442844

Is the ranch that quarter section, or does it also occupy one of the adjacent quarters?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174466995

"Paved" would be a generic value. If you know the type of pavement, that would be of greater value.

surface=paved

shop = vacant is the key for empty shops.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174382876

You seem to have changed the format of the phone number for Flower Child from the standard ITU E.164 format used by OSM to an invalid format, and added a CVS as a node inside a CVS as a building area.

phone=*#Usage
way/501879717

"Added riverbanks" would have probably been a better changeset comment.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174265171

highway=road only works for linear features, not individual nodes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269157

Might be best to upload before moving to a different area so you don't accidentally ping on recent changes in unrelated areas.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174283022

I added the tags for the optometrist office.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174248927

Got it. You had only removed the direction and operator from it. I just deleted the entire camera.

So you're trying to delete this camera entirely?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174041080

Please don't be condescending. I'm trying to help you out as a more senior contributor. If you don't want to be useful, please leave.

I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173977694

I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173977894

I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173979076

Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173982054

Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173979714