"Highway 6 South" is not a valid name, neither is "State Highway 6 South". These are refs, specifically called out in the wiki guidelines about names as being invalid. The official name would be the correct entry for name in this case. Where a highway has no name, only a number, then noname=yes would be appropriate. Duplicating the ref value in name is never the correct name value.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728

Hi there! Looks like you're trying to add a house to the map. I'm guessing the address number is 7851, correct? Is the house actually named or no?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166127678

Aaah, StreetComplete was asking for the address numbers. I've moved those building numbers to the ref=* tag, StreetComplete will probably prompt for the address numbers again. These probably all start with 85, 86 or 87 this far out.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166120893

Were these house numbers supposed to be building numbers by chance?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166120893

Ref=* information is not a name and shouldn't be in name tags like alt_name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728

Those appear to be in the correct position already. Or at least close enough given the circumstances.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165807843

Including when leaving the subdivision on the southbound side? That'd be a very unusual case.

If the exit gate opens for anybody pulling up to it, it might be more permissive than private in that one direction.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165647535

Not bad, though addr:street shouldn't contain abbreviations. You can check out https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?lng=en for tips on how to get opening hours correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165597570

This seems good faith but also incorrect in most cases.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165285637

You're changing links to other types that really don't need changing.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165260842

I tend to give sidewalks the same name as the street they're fronting in order to help blind users, but otherwise this seems fine.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165178120

I remapped this as a private ford, closed entirely to motor vehicles, since that what it appears to be by all available sources.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165175764

Value for studio isn't valid, probably should be studio=television;radio instead
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165039629

Are there two painted lanes? If not, then lanes=2 should be lane_markings=no
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165039031

building=retail is probably what was meant instead of building=shop
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165036903

The "Q" key on a closed way will square the corners.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165036173

Got it, changed it to a gas station.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164531446

Is this a shop where you buy fuel in containers, or his this a gas station with pumps?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164531446

unclassified to residential is a weird change but the others look good.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164991374