OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164227701 10 months ago

Aah, OK, it means it's part of a building. So building:part=yes would just mean it's part of a larger contiguous building.

building:part=*

So in the case of a vacant storefront, I'd remove opening hours and contact information and any amenity=*, office=* or shop=* value and replace it with shop=vacant.

164252118 10 months ago

Names are not refs (so there should be no name on the runway). Multiple values are seperated by semicolon, not slash.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164252118

164227701 10 months ago

If this is standing but not operating, then undoing this change and changing opening_hours to "closed 24/7" might be better. If it's now vacant, then removing opening hours and adding shop=vacant would be better. In either case, building=retail is probably not what you want on building:part=yes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164227701

164178057 10 months ago

Shape matters a lot, please be patient and take time to draw accurately.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178057

163186306 10 months ago

If you have to install an app or create an account to use it, that's not access=yes, that's creating a customer relationship. I'm uninterested in continuing a discussion with someone who is being unnecessarily aggressive in tone about this, either, I have other things to do with my life than deal with hostility.

163186306 10 months ago

I wouldn't exactly call requiring a pre-existing customer relationship in order to use it as open to the public.

163186306 10 months ago

If you have to sign into an app and/or have a pre-existing account to use it, then that's not access=yes at all. access=yes would mean I can walk up with a credit card or cash and plug in without any sort of drama, which just isn't the case here.

161034526 10 months ago

Just a heads up, the correct value separator for multiple values is ; and not /
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161034526

163947426 10 months ago

Please take care when drawing buildings as these don't tend to get updated by other editors very often. the q key in the web editor can square corners. If drawing the building outline is difficult or time consuming, just drawing a single node with the appropriate tags works.

Also some kind of address interpolation is needed here, as 4307-4309 is ambiguous, interpretable as an 8-digit, hyphenated address number, literally all 9 characters; or as a range that also includes odd numbers.

osm.wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163947426

163907905 10 months ago

Looks more like a concrete path since it's not fronting any street for it to be a sidewalk to. Additionally, osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163907905

158991590 10 months ago

Literally drive up with a trailer and take home a shed or tiny house. A surprisingly common business in the region.

163865169 10 months ago

Landuse boundaries shouldn't be attached to highway centerlines, but instead be congruent with the edge of the landuse.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163865169

163846790 10 months ago

Name and branch information incorrectly merged.

changeset/163863950

163846790 10 months ago

Names are only names, not also branch information. Use branch=* for the "Oklahoma City Quail Springs" part.

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163846790

163758549 10 months ago

Yes, TIGER imported everything with names and not refs, so that tracks, however, it's also acknowledged that it wasn't a very good import, in part and among other reasons, because the TIGER data didn't have a concept of ref.

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163758549

163758549 10 months ago

This should probably be ref=PR 20, noname=yes. Refs aren't names.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163758549

163736392 10 months ago

Changeset descriptions go a very long way to helping understand what is going on. "Added flock cameras" would have been a good changeset desc.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163736392

163709433 10 months ago

The operator shouldn't be included in the name, the name should only be the name. There's a separate operator tag for operator information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163709433

163592200 10 months ago

Adding shop=vacant when a business moves out will highlight the location in StreetComplete so the next tenant can be more easily surveyed.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163592200

163547493 10 months ago

Is this a place of business you're expecting people to visit unannounced, or is this your home?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163547493