Mixed case is preferred.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162237145

foot=private is redundant on access=private (which applies to all modes). Might be worth splitting at the gate and removing the access/foot tags from the part north of the gate so the street access to Young Place and the apartment complex isn't blocked by a "private" street.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162211927

You can save yourself some serious time drawing by reusing lines instead of drawing over lines. In order to make several lines a single object, you would need to make a multipolygon relation.

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

You can find working examples of this at relation/18643736 and surrounding vicinity.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162107843

foot=designated would mean that there are signs or pavement markings indicating that route is not only open to pedestrians, but the preferred route for pedestrians. Removing foot=designated from the road and then foot=private (no access without permission) is probably what you're looking for.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139928

Nice addition. Though "name=Potential Hiking Trail?" should probably be a "note=*" tag. Names should only be the names. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162174760

StreetComplete might be an easier way than Osmand for adding locations easily.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162007197

Did the yellow bumpy things get removed on one or both ends of the crossing? In both the Mapbox and Bing imagery it looks like there's tactile paving on both sides but I think that imagery is from 2022.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161988482

OK. As long as there's no "🚷" or "crosswalk closed" sign, that would make it an unmarked and uncontrolled crosswalk here. All sides of all intersections are crosswalks unless otherwise signed in Oklahoma.

Did they add a "Crosswalk Closed" sign here recently? If not, then this would be a legal, uncontrolled, unmarked crosswalk.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161954561

highway=tertiary is probably what you meant instead of secondary. mini_roundabout is for roundabouts with flat islands you can drive over, if you can crash into the center island, then it would be junction=roundabout, not mini_roundabout.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161945188

Aaah, I think instead of leisure=park, it might be worth considering highway=trailhead in that case.

highway=trailhead

Just to be clear, permissive would be "private but the public is generally allowed in", similar to, say, Metrolink's park & ride lots.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161881734

I can't seem to find any record of a park named Dog Trail here. Could you describe a bit more about what you're attempting to map here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161764486

It's inappropriate to include ad copy on OpenStreetMap.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161853065

access=no means nobody can use that path. access=private means you need permission to access that path.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161842448

Should presumably be Southeast, not SE, on the street names.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161764368

The name is only for the name. Please don't add brand or branch information to the name, there's other tags for that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161675313

direction=1234?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161368087

Your building names seem to have added things like alternative names and building numbers. alt_name=* and ref=* would be the correct fields for that information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161359896

The name should only be the name, don't add "defective" there. fixme would be a better key for the note.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161208610