Not response so fiction is now deleted.

Fiction.

You should have been alerted by my comments by now. So can you please finish with adding fiction to the map? It's rather a silly game but you've shown that you do have good skills for mapping. The OpenStreetMap community would like to make you welcome to contribute in a more constructive way.
All Best Wishes, Bernard

Fiction, and not very imaginative.

Middle of the sea?

?

Fiction? name is tagged wrong, way goes across fields.

Again fields.

In the middle of a field?

This is reverted, looks like it was a practice or something went wrong. There was a building on-top of a building with one corner dragged up over the railway line 1/2 mile away.

Hi, the new path is mapped on top of some buildings, as described by the tag layer=1 which means that item is above the building. But it is also tagged tunnel=yes which indicates it is under or through the building.
Clearly the is something not quite right or lacking here?

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted this addition as the new road (Residential Road) is a fiction possibly added by mistake or as a test. The live worldwide database is not the place for testing. Regards

With respect, Way: 447956699 lacks any tagging and looks a bit unusual. Regards

Hello There, I think you may be mistaken regarding the existence of this path. There is a faint path that can be seen on the Bing image from the end of the track. (Certainly the track section ought not be deleted.) The mapper uploaded a gpx trace for the whole route. Starting from the car park going west to near the coast then north as it was mapped. The gpx trace then goes over the hills and back south to their start.
They tagged the path as :- sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking and
trail_visibility=intermediate Thus indicating that the way would be difficult to discern.
These are the sought of paths I seek out when up north and in my humble opinion the way should be left on the map. Even if hard to find it poses no problem to the map tagged as it is to show the way may be difficult to follow.

Tweaked school building and tags.

Removed building which was mapped on the pedestrian bridge over the railway. Station is already mapped.

Tweaked the building outlines and addresses.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
May I please point out that this addition to the OSM database inadvertently duplicate a residential land use area. There are more than fifty house numbers, not just the one you added. There are two or more postcodes.
Post codes and house numbers are best added to individual properties, not to areas or even streets.
It would be best to revert or delete this changeset as it adds no value to OSM rather it detracts from the data by its inaccuracies. I can make the reversion for you if you wish thus returning the data to its former state.
Regards Bernard

Hello, just wanted to let you know that this is a live worldwide database from which lots of ordinary folk build maps. So I have removed your track.
You are most welcome to add genuine features to OSM and there are plenty of resources to learn how to do this properly.
Regards

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It is impossible to work out what you wanted to achieve with this addition to the live OSM database as there are no descriptive tags. What I can deduce is that as far as I am aware this line is not verifiable as existing in reality, (unless you can enlighten me). I will therefore revert (remove) your changeset, reverting means the line can easily be replaced should you be able to show it exists as an on the ground feature.
Regards