Hi, I've added a POI within the building so that the amenity=police tag is mapped.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, OK that's done. Please check with your friend that the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme tags are correct.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please don't get me wrong I'm not arguing or trying to make an argument. I'm merely stating that The Angler has been mapped on top of the existing bar named Mill Street Pub & Kitchen. As it's obviously not correct to map a new building on top of an existing building I offer the solution that is OSM good practice. Which is to amend the existing building to suit the new description. Thus the complete history of the building is maintained in OSM history.

If you wish I can make the amendment for you.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated shop was removed.

Hi, You've got The Angler mapped on top of an existing building the Mill Street Pub & Kitchen. Please don't map new stuff on top of the existing, it's OSM good practice to amend the existing feature when a change is needed like a change of name.

Regards Bernard.

You are also duplicating highways.

Hello, Lots of warnings here of many different problems. At one point I see a road tunnel under a railway that's joined to a level crossing. This junction is just not possible.

Could you please go through your mapping and correct mistakes?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your changes are not to OSM recognised standards being an undescribed area. Thus I've reverted the change. Please try to learn the correct way to map before uploading more changes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say your changes dragged areas out of shape. I've reverted the area changes but kept the name you added to the recreation area. Also added website.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is still a public right of way on the driveway. The correct thing to do in this case is tag the driveway as motor_vehicle=private which I've done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

We are not allowed to use GoogleMaps data as it is copyright material, please see infringement here:- osm.org/copyright

I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.

OK the changeset is reverted back as it was.
Glad to help, Regards Bernard.

Hi, The tag for weight limit is maxweight=??? It's not included in the drop-down menu of the iD editor, you have to type it in.

It looks like all these roads had the width tag added, it would be best to revert the changeset. Would you like me to do the revert for you?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if these roads are really two thousand five hundred metres wide? The Maxwidth is in metres so if it's two and a half metres wide it's tagged as 2.5 (two point five metres). Could you check them please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The tourist attraction is mapped as an area here Way: Leicester Square (4082589). Thus your 4 POI are duplications that I've removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There's quite a mish-mash here, a self-intersecting stream, three fords, and a footpath going under a footway bridge. Could you have a look and remedy please?

Regards Bernard.

No response so removed.

Hi srbrook,
I got called away this morning, I think all the duplicates are now removed. I've commented to the new mapper.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, A lot of your newly added highways have been placed on top of existing highways. Thus disrupting routing. I think I've removed all the problem sections.

If a way needs amending (which I don't think is actually the case here) then the amendment should be to the existing way. Thus the ways history is properly maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Unless there is a physical presence of the business at that place, (joined to a car park road). And the presence is verifiable then the POI should not be on OSM. Anyway, the website address is in the USA.

Regards Bernard.