BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 124614965 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Surely there would be foot access through or by these gates to get to the public paths. Maybe agricultural access as well. The tag access=no on it's own means there is no access through at all. Regards Bernard. |
| 124614056 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I would question whether the path does actually go through the building or if are there two paths going to two entrances to the building. If it goes through then it should be mapped appropriately, is it an internal corridor straight through, a passageway, or open space under a roof? At the moment the path passes over the building and routing is not determined as going through the building. It's just wrong. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 124557052 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. A named node/point is really meaningless to the OSM database or any map rendering. It is not therefore a verifiable feature. Personal data, POIs should be saved offline, not uploaded to a live worldwide database. Sorry, but IMHO the name ought be removed as per OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 124555077 | over 3 years ago | Capitalised name. |
| 124554915 | over 3 years ago | Capitalised name. |
| 124554782 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Wellington Pier is already mapped so your commercial area is a data duplication. Also, OSM practice is that formal names are capitalised. should be. I've removed the area, capitalised the name, and squared the buildings up. Regards Bernard. |
| 124497660 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've tweaked the house outlines and addresses. You'd somehow drawn a house atop of another. Regards Bernard. |
| 124486260 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've reverted your changes, this line is outlining a residential area, it's not a highway. Regards Bernard. |
| 124487873 | over 3 years ago | Hi, It's handy for folk to know if benches have backrests, via the tag backrest=yes/no. Regards Bernard. |
| 124359534 | over 3 years ago | Hi, OK thanks for that. I've now removed all the lines from OSM. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 124444256 | over 3 years ago | Please stop your vandalism. This is your map as well so it really doesn't make sense to do this. I think I've corrected your amendments. Thanks & Regards Bernard |
| 124246280 | over 3 years ago | No response so I've corrected the problems mentioned above. |
| 124359534 | over 3 years ago | Hello There,
So, where/how can I send you the GPX file? Once you've got it and are happy we can remove the lines from the OSM database. Second thoughts,,, I've uploaded the GPX file here:- https://ufile.io/cq61bih2 You have 30 days to download it. Please let me know if the all above is OK. Regards Bernard. |
| 124337986 | over 3 years ago | I've sent an email via OSM so we can continue the conversation. |
| 124359534 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm sorry to say that this is not the correct way to record routes in the OSM database. The lines added are mostly untagged; at best, some have a description in the name tag. In this manner, OSM nor any rendered map can use the data to produce a logical map. I think you may be trying to record routes for your personal use. It's OK to do this but not to upload them to the OSM database. There are applications (like JOSM) that you can use to record your personal routes and save them to your own PC. Thus not corrupting the OSM data. All these routes if not appropriately defined should be removed from the OSM database. I've not removed anything in order to give you a chance to save them to your PC. Regards Bernard. |
| 124358665 | over 3 years ago | Reverted back to a viaduct as are the other buildings. |
| 124348601 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've placed the gate on the fence line rather than on all the path lines. Regards Bernard. |
| 124337986 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've tweaked the tags a bit. It would be good if the actual site could be mapped. Need any help just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 124311044 | over 3 years ago | Hi, OSM tags bunkers as surface=sand rather than natural, the sand is not a naturally occurring feature. I've tweaked the bunkers. Regards Bernard. |
| 124295850 | over 3 years ago | Hi, This looks very much like advertising. The point lacks in that it is situated in the street rather than at/in a building. The tags are far from OSM practice. The website and phone pertain to the agency not the premises.
Regards Bernard. |