Way: 1034838897 looks like it goes through a wall to Frog Street. Is this actually a private garden path?

Hi, Way: 915832413 you've drawn to go through a building, (warnings were given above). this cannot be correct. Is there a gap, bridge, tunnel, or perhaps a passageway? Just adding things isn't much good if they are incorrect. You cannot proceed along this way as mapped, the building blocks the way.

Regards Bernard.

Corrections made.

You've also made quite an unusual mishmash of paths and grass area near School Close.

Hi, The footpath through the orchard and school grounds doesn't look right. The path doesn't join onto the B3227 and I doubt the public ought go through the school grounds. The orchard doesn't look like an orchard. Are these fictional ways?

Regards Bernard.

You joined the orchard to the road center line, I've corrected it.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the name"path" from your new path. Also removed the extension from Old Tiverton Road which made for highway duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just want to point out that placing a bridge on top of a road makes for highway duplication, thus disrupting routing. There should only be one highway. What you ought to have done in this situation is make a section in the existing highway where the bridge is and then tag the bridge section appropriately. I've deleted your bridge and amended the original highway to include the bridge.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you dragged several nodes quite a way of position making several self-intersections of area outlines. I think I've corrected them all. Please check before uploading.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed Queenborough Grove as it duplicates the existing highway, and County Council names the whole road as Queenborough Lane.

Queenborough Grove is not the name of a highway rather it is the name of a group of houses on Queenborough Lane as can be seen on the council map.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Ash, I've removed the section of road where the steps are. Need any more help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, are you sure the steps go all the way past the hospital? Also you've placed the steps on top of the existing highway (motorable road), the highway or part of it should be removed. I can help if you wish.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You placed the long cart path on top of existing highways making duplicated highways. This is not only wrong mapping (not ground truth), but it also disrupts routing. It's OSM practice that if a way needs correcting/amending the correction is done to the existing way, thus all history is maintained.

I've removed the duplicate highways and amended the existing highways to show your new tagging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The ways across the field are the definitive line of a public footpath and a public bridleway. Even if the landowner refuses to accept this and/or obstructs the highways they are still highways. Please see here for public rights of way in Norfolk as proof of existence:- http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/highways/

Thus I've reinstated the highways.
Regards Bernard.

Shard Drive (if it exists wouldn't have an address. It might have a tag postal_code=??? but not an addr:postcode=???

I notice also that the road doubles back on itself. Going from the Crescent into the field then back again.

Hi, I am wondering, is Shard Drive a new residential highway? I can find no reference to it on the Caulderdale Council website nor any imagery. Can you show its existence please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The house numbers are not the house names, fiction removed again. Please desist in adding incorrect data to OSM.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the duplicate edges are reported on OSM Inspector Routing layer:- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.38640&lat=53.04646&zoom=14
Two are still there, they will disappear after today.

My thinking is that Jessop Lodge is a place/locality name but some folk disagree with this. It's actually the whole building block that has the name Jessop Lodge and the numbers are of the flats/apartments of the block.

Hi, Royal Mail postcode finder and derbyshire.gov.uk, give the addresses as:-
(Numbers 1 to 8) Jessop Lodge
Jessop Street
Codnor
Ripley
DE5 9SW

So it seems that Jessop Lodge does not exist as a street, rather the four buildings comprising Jessop Lodge are situated on Jessop Street.

Your small piece of highway was visible and was joined to and on the same line as the existing highway, making for duplication.

I don't know if there is a correct answer but it shouldn't be duplication of a highway. I would think a change to the building addresses of the small residential area would be better.

Regards Bernard.