Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Something looks odd here, your new building is mapped on top of the library. Which to OSM means there is a building within a building. One feature should be tagged as building:part=???

I understand that there are new flats here so to understand the layout could you describe the extent of the library please? Is it all on the ground floor? Is number 2a Ascham road actually part of the library?

If I can understand the layout perhaps I can help make corrections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've split the outline to show separate buildings rather than building atop building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I am wondering what the meaning is of your two nodes tagged with names only of "Beccles Tri Club training" and "WVAC Training". You may not be aware that a name only is of no use if OSM doesn't know what it is a name of. Further features added to OSM must be on the ground features and verifiable to everyone else. Please see:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

If these are personal features they should not be added to OSM. However, you may be in the process of adding something like a route. If so if you could explain your intention maybe I could help.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, This problem is a bit confusing, I'll try to explain. Lots of sections of different ways (in this case cycleway highways) are combined into a route. Usually it is the route relation that holds the name for the combined ways that make up the route. Different sections of highways on the route could have their own formal names. Therefore the route name is placed in the route relation tagging.

Here we also have a further confusion. In that the Cycle Superhighway route has been added to the route relation named "NE Lincs local cycle network" ID 11515005. Some sections of Cycle Superhighway however are not included in the NE Lincs relation. There's more, some sections of the Cycle Superhighway are duplicated in the NE Lincs relation.

So, I think the best thing to do is change name=Cycle Superhighway to description=Cycle Superhighway. And remove the duplicates from the NE links relation.

The NE links relation is not actually a route it's rather a collection of pieces of unjoined cycleway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Your correction resulted in the stile being on a short spur of the footpath. From experience, I would think the stile should be a barrier to the path route. Thus I've combined the two sections of the path and positioned the stile to be a barrier on the path.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You're making a lot of problems with these paths you are adding. A lot of sections of your paths are placed on top of existing highways making duplications that disrupt routing.
In many places you've joined paths to waterways and other features. Sometimes crossing waterways, sometimes running on top of waterways.

Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/2sxvpvaf these are the highway duplications, there are many more problems. Could you please remove or correct your mapping? If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A couple of things I'd like to point out, the name as spelled was not, I think, intentionally derogative in any way. It was actually misspelled, the correct spelling was "Scumptious", this word is in the dictionaries and is not an offensive word by English standards.

Secondly, it's wrong to delete something just because you presume it to be offensive. Also if it was ascertained as offensive one would only remove the offensive section (word). Further, it's not OSM policy to remove the building outline or address in such circumstances.

Thus I've reverted the deletion, and corrected the name. I did look up the cafe and found that it was closed in 2018, so I've now tagged the amenity and name as disused as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

PS My comments are as a fairly local person, your locale is Australia, I wonder, is the word Scumchus a derogatory term over there?

Hi, Does footway Way: 753031521 join to the service road Way: 84483682 from the stile?

Hi, Is there a bridge where the cycleway crosses the Royal Dock waterway?

Hi, Duplicated POI removed.

Hi, the tag bunker is surface=sand not landuse=sand. Same with tees, fairways, rough, and greens it's surface=grass, not landuse=grass.

Hi, No problem, glad to help.

Your mentioning that they seemed not to join prompted me to look again to make sure I didn't miss anything.

Now I see that actually (before your duplicate tunnel), neither the tunnel nor the two bridges had a layer tag. Routers would not then be able to determine how the highways passed each other, this could have resulted in the cycleway appearing not a continuous route. I've now also tagged the bridges as layer=1, thus routers know the cycleway goes under the A180. Please let me know if there's still a problem with the cycleway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You duplicated the tunnel section of the highway. I've removed the duplicate and placed your new tags on the existing highway.

The existing highway section holds a relation for a cycle route.

Please note to amend existing features rather than deleting and redrawing, or drawing anew over the existing ones.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, No not a fan of twitter. You can send a message direct by clicking on my handle above. I'll help if I can.

The message to Jim via the website contact bounced back.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The descriptive name tag is removed. Regards Bernard.

Hi, I removed the name as that's not a formal verifiable name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The contact web page works so I've amended the website address and informed Jim.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You requested a review, this is very difficult due to the large number, (over 100), of features that are contained in this single changeset. You had two highway warnings in this changeset, to find and correct those warnings one has to now go through a lot of the individual edits. So it's a good policy to upload edits regularly with ten to twenty edits per upload (changeset). Also, please keep your editing in a reasonably small bounding box (area).

Anyway, I'll try to go through everything and make the necessary corrections.
The first problem is the joining footway Way: 1020234952 to cable line Way: 388353168.
The tag name=Suds Area, Suds Area would not be a formal verifiable name I've changed the tag to description=Sustainable urban drainage systems, several of these.
I've squared up all of the buildings.
I removed the farmland multipolygon relation/11039673 as it's a mere polygon.

I made quite a few corrections and squared up all the buildings but that was a pretty good first editing session. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Well done, I've changed the car park to a private garden and just tweaked the outlines a bit.

Need Any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Crikey that was six years ago! I think the reason at that time was I could not decide what was best to do, but I wanted to mark the area. History, the original hall, a massive building was demolished/divided up years ago. The complex is still the hub of the Dillington Hall farm estate. Your prompt has led me to find one of the buildings is now called Dillington Hall. I've amended it to suit.

Regards Bernard.