Hi, Sorry to say that you need to remove the duplicate highways completely, not just remove the golf tags leaving the highway as a duplication. I thought it best to make some amendments as I found them as they are many and varied. Easier to do than to explain them. Hope that's OK.

I've removed highway Way: 1011449229, tweaked the car park so as not to join to any highways. Tweaked car park service roads. Removed duplicate Way: 1011449230. Removed unnecessary nodes and squared up buildings. Removed duplicate Way: 1011449231. Removed duplicated Way: 1011449232. Amended some existing highways. Removed self-intersections from Way: 1009728264.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The other day mapper GinaroZ drew a footpath across the landslip stating "description=landslip - cautiously and carefully passable on foot only." So it looks like you may be able to pass walking with your cycle. I'd suggest you contact GinaroZ at "@GinaroZ2 to see if he can confirm you can pass pushing a cycle.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Very nice first go at mapping to OSM. I've made a few amendments to suit OSM practice. Please see:- leisure=golf_course to help with your tagging of golf courses. Also only formal verifiable names are used in OSM.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've mapped service highways Way: 1011449229, Way: 1011449230, Way: 1011449231 and Way: 1011449232 on top of existing highways making for duplication. It is OSM practice not to duplicate highways and if there is a highway atop of another they should not be joined and should be differentiated by a layer=? tag.

It's OSM practice that if a way needs correcting/amending then the existing way is edited with the correction/amendment. Thus the history of changes is maintained.

You've also drawn a building Way: 1009728270 around an existing building, adding the tag layer=1 to the existing building. Way: 1009728270 does not look like a building and ought be amended or removed.

Do you need help removing the duplications and making corrections?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicate highways and added a route relation for the walk. Please see here:- https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=13541447

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for responding.

First off I've rolled back your three changesets to the state as before you tried to correct things. Now we can see that mapper eteb3 made the change in August 2021 to split Moll Road and place barriers at the split ends of the road. From several imagery layers, (if you zoom in), you can see that the stream has washed away a section of road, and earth barriers have been made to safeguard the road users from going over the edge. I have no idea if this situation still exists or if the road has been repaired.

A search of the internet https://tinyurl.com/yu6y5mbf seems to suggest the road is obstructed until further notice. I think the best way to find out the status of the road is to contact the The Highland Council, https://tinyurl.com/3a9ztcnd

Unfortunately I think you'll have to make a detour. If I can help further please just ask/comment here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Unfortunately, some sections of the Eday Walk that you've added are duplicating existing highways. Not only is duplication incorrect but it really messes with routing software.

The best way to add a route like this is with a route relation. Where necessary sectioning up sections of existing highways and add them to the route relation. All data pertaining to the route is held in the route relation. The route name should be in the relation not added to individual sections of the route.

The duplicate highways should be removed and the existing highway amended if necessary. Would you like me to add the route relation?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your edits here don't look correct. You've mapped 3 fords, is this correct?

The linear ford, Way: 1011042572, doubles back on itself and has an extra duplicated node which is incorrect mapping.

I interpret "Deze weg is niet onderbroken" as meaning "This road is not interrupted". So is the road interrupted or not? Is it interrupted by 1, 2 or 3 fords?

If you have recently visited here could you please explain what the true situation is? I could then probably correct the mapping.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just wanted to point out that you've, quite likely inadvertently, placed a footpath, Way: 1010211240 on top of the existing highway Way: 367825101. Thus making for duplication of a highway. It's the same situation with footpath Way: 1010211243.

I've removed the two duplicating highways and amended the existing highway to suit your new data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, no response so I've made a few amendments.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, The allotments don't extend to the center of Hawes Side Lane nor over the houses on Hawes Side Lane. I've made amendments.

Hi, You duplicated the highway by adding a new one, I've removed the duplication. Please make amendments/corrections to the existing way thus keeping all history of editing intact.

There's no white line in the center of this road so its not likely to be an unclassified highway. More likely a service road.

Hi, The steps don't go to the center of Devonshire Road, amended to suit.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm pretty sure the whole building isn't the pub. Added website to POI. Amended the building tags.

Regards Bernard.

Same problem with Grassmere Close and Devonshire Square Mews, duplicate removed. Please don't draw new ways to make amendments/corrections, the corrections should be made to the existing ways.

Duplicates removed.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Eagle Drive was duplicated, I've removed the duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, sidewalk=both would be the tag for these highways. The sidewalk=separate tag is for sidewalks separately mapped from the carraigeway. Please see:- sidewalk=*

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OK, gentle review. Just a few things to query.

Does Way: Albert Street (156959780) go through the middle of what appears to be a roundabout Way: 1007289480?

You've mapped Costa Coffee as a building and a POI. OSM practice is "One feature, one OSM element". Thus I've grouped all data on the building to avoid duplication of data.

Way: Internal Road (1007289484), I doubt the formal name is Internal Road, it seems to be your description of the road and can be tagged as such. This road really looks like a road servicing the business, highway=service rather than unclassified. The road around the cafe is usually oneway, is this the case here? I've made a few changes except the oneway.

Is the circle Way: 1007289483 a roundabout? If so adding the tag junction=roundabout will automatically indicate it's a clockwise UK oneway road. (likewise with Way: 1007289480).

Ought Way: 1007289481 be classed as a service road?

Lastly Way: 1007289479 is a duplication of part of the circular Way: 1007289480, I've removed it for you.

Need any help with the above please just ask by commenting here.

Regards Bernard.

Please see the comment on your note. You can activate the notes layer (to see them displayed) via the layers icon at the right of this page.

Regards Bernard.