Hi the school name in on the premises boundary outline as per OSM practice. I've removed the name from the building and amended the name on the outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, requested review.
The grass outline was self-intersecting as was the fence line. The residential area was dragged out of alignment and was thus self-intersecting. Same with the school outline.

The footpath had about multiple nodes on the same spot in two places, it was placed on top of the fence and other boundary lines.

It would have been very difficult to explain how to rectify these problems so I've made corrections. I also remove the formal name 'Public footpath@from a single node.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

I've amended the two POIs to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Removed duplication.

This looks like fiction so I've removed it.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked your tags to OSM practice. Please don't use OSM tags or comments for advertising. Your business description is on your website.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The school name and data are on the premises outline as per OSM practice, so there's no need to add the name to each building.

Regards Bernard.

Path tags amended to OSM practice. Please note there is foot access to a footpath so access=no shouldn't be used.

Path tags amended to OSM practice.

Highway tags amended to OSM practice.

Path tags amended.

Hello,
As I said before the path would not be formally named "Footpath 45". Thus I've removed the fiction.

Further caution=concealed ditch is not a recognised key/value tag in OSM, Thus I've changed it to note=concealed ditch which is accepted but will not be rendered. Only an editor will see the note.

Regards Bernard.

Amended footpath tagging.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Footpath 45 would not really be a formal name.

A path with a parish number I assume would be a public footpath. So I've amended the tagging to reflect this.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Inspire Medics seem to be a credit and finance company office rather than an educational institution office. Features added to OSM must be verifiable, please see:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

I think this is an online-only facility, the tagging is misleading at best. OpenStreetMap is not a business directory. If your online facility does not have a physical presence then it may not be added to OSM. If it does have a physical presence - for example, if there is an office somewhere - then you can place an office=company POI where that office is.

If you add further tags then understand that these tags will describe that physical location, i.e. the office. Do not, for example, add a tag that implies 24/7 opening hours just because the web site is open 24/7 - only add such a tag if the office is open 24/7. Same with any tags that would describe what you are selling; do not add descriptions that advertise, the link to your wesite will surfice.

Under no circumstances must you add advertising copy ("World's finest XY", "Premier ABC supplier", "For all your XYZ needs"); this has no place in OSM and should be deleted.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be more careful, you have tagged some long sections of highways as bridges.

Hi, I've removed Way: 962946913 (unclassified highway) that you placed on top of an existing footpath. There does not seem to be an unclassified highway on this line.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed a duplicated highway. Please don't place a highway on top of an existing highway it's duplication that messes with routing.

If a highway (or any feature) needs correcting/amending please correct/amend the existing feature thus the way history will be maintained. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tagging of the features here to more meet OSM practice. the name= tag is for formal verifiable names, not descriptions.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed/amended dubious tags. It may well be a Palace of Tat but I can find no formal reference to that name. Names must be verifiable.

Regards Bernard.