BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 107160739 | over 4 years ago | Hi, 1 bench is placed on a wood area outline. 1 bench is placed on the basketball pitch outline. Highway tagged as a bench as stated per the last changeset. 1 benched placed on path centerline around yacht pond. Regards Bernard. |
| 107159020 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I'll list the problems, 6 of the benches are placed on the center lines of paths. 1 bench is placed on a hedge. 2 picnic tables are placed on a playground outline as well as 1 bench. 1 waste bucket placed on a path centerline. You've tagged a long section of path as a bench, also bench description details are tagged to the path. You've tagged North Park Meadow as a multipolygon, it's just a regular polygon so no need for a type tag or a relation. May I please suggest these features be correctly tagged, placing the beaches etc to the correct sides of the paths or feature outlines? If you need help please just say. Regards Bernard. |
| 99993841 | over 4 years ago | Hi, there are two houses addr:housenumber=28
Regards Bernard. |
| 107073078 | over 4 years ago | Hi, It seems that you've added a new section of coastline, making two coast outlines near the A838. I think your new coast line should be removed as it's OSM practice to amend/correct existing features. It also looks like the new coastline has been added to the GB coast multipolygon, this also should be removed from the multipolygon. Your new coastline has a self-intersection, this drew me to inspect it. If you need help making corrections please just ask. Regards Bernard.
|
| 107076375 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Way: 5596979 was a park within a park. I've changed it to a recreation area as it's where games are played. I also removed layer=1 as that tag is not needed. Regards Bernard. |
| 107032827 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Just wanted to point out an anomaly. It looks like this changeset has orthogonalized the outer line (Way: 936644516) of a multipolygon. I'm not sure how or why, but to check I temporarily reverted this changeset wholly and the multipolygon reinstated its original shape. So it must be this changeset. Unfortunately, JOSM seems not able to revert just the multipolygon. It's a huge changeset in which you've added a lot of data so perhaps you could have a look at saving your changes then reverting the problem outline. Regards Bernard. |
| 106952412 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Your fiction has been reverted. |
| 106952478 | over 4 years ago | Changeset reverted to remove fiction |
| 106953087 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've reverted this changeset because it inadvertently dragged many highways out of shape. Regards Bernard. |
| 106952967 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've reverted this changeset because it inadvertently dragged highways out of shape. Regards Bernard. |
| 106912256 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately your new Way: 957920517 is placed entirely atop of existing ways making for duplication of highways. I've checked and there is no new data to be added to OSM. Thus I've reverted this changeset to reinstate the alterations the duplication made and correct the mapping warnings given above. If I can help with anything please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 106863036 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Features mapped to OSM must be verifiable. Is there a disused red phone box here? Can you please post a recent photo? If the spice museum is genuine then there are more tags that can be added to better describe the feature. Regards Bernard. |
| 106706233 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Restricted byway would be the highway authority legal designation for that highway. Thus I've amended to suit. I also amended the service leading out to the B3095. Regards Bernard. |
| 106745639 | over 4 years ago | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 106620304 | over 4 years ago | This is not a bridge, I've removed the incorrect tags. Regards Bernard. |
| 106635926 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've removed your Way: 956074564 as it is a very long way almost entirely duplicating existing ways. Regards Bernard. |
| 106752041 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Just wanted to point out that OSM practice is that the address:city is the postal city for the area so that's Norwich. Please see this link:- addr=* Regards Bernard. |
| 106716420 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. That would be a retail business as the public can go there. So I've reinstated the tag and added shop=furniture. Regards Bernard. |
| 106702958 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Does the other information regarding the cafe need to be removed from the building addr:housenumber=15? If it is relevant to the new cafe building it could be transferred. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 106655443 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I tweaked these areas a bit but the main amendment was to add layer=1 to the platform to indicate its relation to the water. With no layer tag, like the water, it is implied the water is layer=0, the platform tagged as layer=1 is therefore rendered as above the layer=0 water. Regards Bernard. |