Forgot to say please see :- http://tinyurl.com/jf5amft

Hi, a few of your ways are not tagged!

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you are drawing you buildings from the roof outlines of aerial imagery. With respect may I suggest you read this page :- http://tinyurl.com/zorbq9x
which explains how to overcome the oblique angles oft encountered in photo imagery. Your outlines for the apartments are several feet away from the building (ground) footprint.
If you need any help on OSM mapping just ask.
Regards

OK, being remote I couldn't see that.
Just needs the access=private to be removed from the parking bay.

Exactly my thinking.
Also I could see nothing to prevent or restrict public use on foot of the two footways (Way: 198204474 & Way: 198204473).

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This is a live map seen by the world and therefore not the proper place to do testing and then upload that testing. I see you have now removed one of the unnecessary nodes. Would you please remove the others as well. Thanks.

Reverted changeset to reinstate proper description of road and remove building connected to same road.

I changed both names back to the proper English names. Your addition I take it was in your native language, this could be added in the correct manner like the other languages are, name:??=???????

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've squared up the buildings and pool to make them all look neater (I'm pretty sure they don't all have unsquare angles). This facility is available in the iD editor (select item then "Square the corners of this area").
I also added access=private to the pool, because as it's in a house garden I assume it's not a public facility. Regards

Hi, if you've finished mapping the turbine positions could the untagged grid lines, (Way: 426314996) be removed as they add nothing to the map. If you wish to keep them as your reference they can be saved offline. Regards

Hi, I removed the duplicated section of Goodmayes Road maintaining your lcn=yes tag.

Hi, you don't show how the long footpath (Way: 174818288) crosses the two streams, are they crossed by bridges, fords??

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There are a few problems with your addition to the OSM database. You placed your new node on top of an existing car park node, (only one will show, the car park).
Everything added to OSM must be verifiable on the ground. The address you used is not for this point on the map. So does your business have a physical presence here? If so please add the correct address. If not please re-position and re-address the business at a point that can be verified on the ground.
The address you give is already mapped in OSM. It is a company that provides businesses with virtual offices.
To recap, if you are verifiable at this point please correct the information, if not please remove the POI.

Hi, this parking area looks like it is not restricted to residents only. It looks like it is part of the highway, if so then the access=private tag should be removed.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've somehow removed all tags from two foot-ways and two garden areas. Let me know if you need help fixing it.

Hi I've added the college website and corrected the facility name.
If you wish to add second language descriptions please do so but in the correct way.

Hi, this cycleway you've added has resulted in a duplication of highways (one on top of another). There was an existing path here which it would have been better to amend rather than adding the duplicate way, then all history would have been retained.
The matter of duplication should be corrected as it seriously disrupts routeing.

Hi I have removed duplicated section of way Seven Kings Road

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please take a bit of time to understand the basics and good practices of adding data to OSM. Your drawing of these buildings is a bit haphazard to say the least. There's lots of online help to show how to map well and you can always look at how other areas are mapped, or just ask for help.
I'll now tidy up your additions so you can see how all mapping could look.

Is it a hairdresser as well? If not then the shop=hairdresser tag should be removed