BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 98470023 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, If the phone box remains its a valid feature for the OSM database. I've reinstated it and tagged it as description=Red phone box with telephone removed, disused:amenity=telephone. Regards Bernard. |
| 98442445 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Apologies for interfering. I've reverted my changes so you can now see the self-intersection of Way: 901759841 to the west. When I removed the self-intersection JOSM reported buildings within buildings, this led me to think there was duplication. If the whole block is one building then Way: 901759841 should be extended to cover the whole building footprint. You are correct that the internal or elevated sections of the building should be termed building:part. Please see building:part=* The building parts can be tagged as to their use (roof garden), address (for different towers), also levels and or layers can be added. This does get a bit complicated though. Regards Bernard |
| 98426164 | almost 5 years ago | I've removed area from highway centre line |
| 98426231 | almost 5 years ago | I unjoined grass area from the highway centerline. |
| 98419022 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, I've reverted your changes to the road and junction because they seem dubious. I added the building by your shop POI, perhaps you could reposition it over the correct house. I've added the address and website to the POI. Regards Bernard. |
| 98394715 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. With respect, if a feature is on the ground then it's a valid feature to be added to OSM. So there's no need to remove something like this. If the feature needs amending/correcting it's OSM practice to do this to the existing feature. So I've reinstated the path and amended the tags to access=forestry, highway=track. I've also added the public footpath. Regards Bernard. |
| 98220815 | almost 5 years ago | My sincere apologies to JacobSt, I am completely in the wrong. I saw the accommodation in London was not here so looked for an office address and found the Bristol one. But I do not offer this as an excuse, I am wrong, sorry. Regards Bernard. |
| 98231068 | almost 5 years ago | Even more duplications. Is there something wrong? Can I help? |
| 98291555 | almost 5 years ago | You've connected track Way: 900892148 to two streams without either a bridge or ford. You also connected track Way: 900892135 to a boundary line instead of the nearby highway Castle Lane. |
| 98291274 | almost 5 years ago | You are still duplicating sections of highway, please stop. |
| 98167022 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, That's about 40 more sections of duplicated highway you've added around here. I've removed as many as I can but please stop this inadvertent vandalism. Thanks, Bernard. |
| 98145100 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, You're still making lots of duplicate highways around here. Please be a bit more careful and stop placing highway atop highway. Why? Because it seriously disrupts routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 98166597 | almost 5 years ago | Removed self intersections, crossing highways, rectified highway crossing water. |
| 98220815 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. This building is not the registered office for THE STUDENT HOUSING COMPANY (LONDON) LIMITED which is situated in Bristol. Could you please remove the incorrect POI? It would be OK to map it at the correct location. Regards Bernard. |
| 97922456 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
Regards Bernard. |
| 97856330 | almost 5 years ago | No response so I added access=private and an explanation note. |
| 97856713 | almost 5 years ago | No response so I've corrected your mistakes by re-positioning the silo as best I can. Then adding the slurry tank. |
| 98196532 | almost 5 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please take a little time to learn about OSM best practice for contributing. You'll find it's a wonderful database to which you can add almost any information provided its added in the correct way. Unfortunately in trying to promote your company you've added false information which negatively impacted the database. Thus I've reverted your changes. I would normally try to help by getting info from the web but in this case, when trying to access your website I'm told "Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead". So I can't help. Regards Bernard. |
| 97995505 | almost 5 years ago | I've just removed a duplicate bridge you placed atop of the original bridge. |
| 98072114 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Please be careful and check warnings before uploading, I've just removed several sections of duplicate track you added. Regards Bernard. |