OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
97512518 almost 5 years ago

Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344

Regards Bernard.

97512464 almost 5 years ago

Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344

Regards Bernard.

97511876 almost 5 years ago

Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344

Regards Bernard.

97496672 almost 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You placed your new unnamed road Way: 895210964 on top of the existing roadway Glebe Crescent, thus duplicating a highway. I've removed your duplicating way. It's OSM practice to make amendments/corrections to the existing way thereby keeping all history intact. So if Glebe Crescent needs correcting pleas do this to the existing way. Further in the absence of highway restrictions, it is implied that there are normal rights of access thus bicycle=yes
foot=yes
motor_vehicle=yes are implied on a highway=living_street.

Is this section of Glebe Crescent really 20mph as you've not indicated the other sections as such, seems isolated.

I've tweaked the houses a bit as well.

Regards Bernard
Need help please just ask.

97571898 about 5 years ago

Hi, Thanks for your informative reply. It would be really good to have the car parks checked and amended.

Regards Bernard.

97571898 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I looked at your addition of motor_vehicle=no to most of Fairmead Road and wonder how the two car parks near the middle of that road are accessed. Are they also closed to vehicles?

Regards Bernard.

97553757 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I tweaked your new tags to suit OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

97512518 about 5 years ago

Hi, Could you please respond ASAP about the questions regarding this and previous deletion of data from OSM.

You'll find it difficult to revert these deletions, I can revert them for you if you wish. It would be good if you could give your reason for the changes though.

Regards Bernard.

97177736 about 5 years ago

No response so I've removed the construction tags for you.

97310201 about 5 years ago

Hi,

Footpath Way: 893004174 is separated from the carriageway by a grass verge so it's not a sidewalk. I've removed that tag and also removed grass areas from the centres of highways.

Regards Bernard.

97515784 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It seems that someone made a duplicate outline of the hospital. I've removed the newer outline leaving the 2010 outline. I then tweaked the drawing, adding your new data (many thanks) to the original building, also added the website.

Regards Bernard.

97511876 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Theses tracks were tagged as private. So I wonder why you have deleted them?

The tracks and heath can clearly be seen from imagery. They've been on the OSM database for several years and some are marked on Ordnance Survey maps. Ordnance Survey and Norfolk CC have much more data about this private land so I see no valid reason to delete it from OSM.

Regards Bernard.

97328736 about 5 years ago

No response so I've remove the duplicated section of way, added hedges and bridges.

97396757 about 5 years ago

Hi, surely the garden outline extends to the fence and building lines? Or is there a ragged gap of up to 3 feet between garden and fence? In 50 years working on housing projects, I've never seen anything laid out like this!

Regards Bernard

10084943 about 5 years ago

Hi.

The fences don't go through the middle of the buildings. Could you please amend all the incidences?

Many Thanks, Bernard.

97399903 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made quite a few tweaks to the paths and cycleways you've added. This to joins some ways and better align them to other features.

Regards Bernard.

97382774 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This building has multiple addresses, (numbers, streets and postcodes). There are many apartments on the upper floors so it's wrong to place any single address on the whole building. Thus I've removed the address data. If you know the apartment addresses you could add address data to the entrances but that would probably be difficult.

I've added to the Rolex address.

Regards Bernard.

97362296 about 5 years ago

Hi, Nobody has said this is a PRoW, have they? It is a private farm track and as virtually all land in the UK is private a more appropriate tag would be access=agricultural, this states what the access actually is.

Regards Bernard.

97328736 about 5 years ago

Hi, You have a duplicated section of path here and three places where the path crosses water with no bridge, one of which your path joins onto the water.
Need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

97328172 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the path was in the wrong place, (as per your comment above), could you say why you deleted it rather moving it to the correct position and amending the tags? Thanks.

Regards Bernard.