BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 97512518 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344 Regards Bernard. |
| 97512464 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344 Regards Bernard. |
| 97511876 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344 Regards Bernard. |
| 97496672 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You placed your new unnamed road Way: 895210964 on top of the existing roadway Glebe Crescent, thus duplicating a highway. I've removed your duplicating way. It's OSM practice to make amendments/corrections to the existing way thereby keeping all history intact. So if Glebe Crescent needs correcting pleas do this to the existing way. Further in the absence of highway restrictions, it is implied that there are normal rights of access thus bicycle=yes
Is this section of Glebe Crescent really 20mph as you've not indicated the other sections as such, seems isolated. I've tweaked the houses a bit as well. Regards Bernard
|
| 97571898 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Thanks for your informative reply. It would be really good to have the car parks checked and amended. Regards Bernard. |
| 97571898 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I looked at your addition of motor_vehicle=no to most of Fairmead Road and wonder how the two car parks near the middle of that road are accessed. Are they also closed to vehicles? Regards Bernard. |
| 97553757 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I tweaked your new tags to suit OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 97512518 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Could you please respond ASAP about the questions regarding this and previous deletion of data from OSM. You'll find it difficult to revert these deletions, I can revert them for you if you wish. It would be good if you could give your reason for the changes though. Regards Bernard. |
| 97177736 | about 5 years ago | No response so I've removed the construction tags for you. |
| 97310201 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Footpath Way: 893004174 is separated from the carriageway by a grass verge so it's not a sidewalk. I've removed that tag and also removed grass areas from the centres of highways. Regards Bernard. |
| 97515784 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Regards Bernard. |
| 97511876 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Theses tracks were tagged as private. So I wonder why you have deleted them? The tracks and heath can clearly be seen from imagery. They've been on the OSM database for several years and some are marked on Ordnance Survey maps. Ordnance Survey and Norfolk CC have much more data about this private land so I see no valid reason to delete it from OSM. Regards Bernard. |
| 97328736 | about 5 years ago | No response so I've remove the duplicated section of way, added hedges and bridges. |
| 97396757 | about 5 years ago | Hi, surely the garden outline extends to the fence and building lines? Or is there a ragged gap of up to 3 feet between garden and fence? In 50 years working on housing projects, I've never seen anything laid out like this! Regards Bernard |
| 10084943 | about 5 years ago | Hi. The fences don't go through the middle of the buildings. Could you please amend all the incidences? Many Thanks, Bernard. |
| 97399903 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've made quite a few tweaks to the paths and cycleways you've added. This to joins some ways and better align them to other features. Regards Bernard. |
| 97382774 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've added to the Rolex address. Regards Bernard. |
| 97362296 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Nobody has said this is a PRoW, have they? It is a private farm track and as virtually all land in the UK is private a more appropriate tag would be access=agricultural, this states what the access actually is. Regards Bernard. |
| 97328736 | about 5 years ago | Hi, You have a duplicated section of path here and three places where the path crosses water with no bridge, one of which your path joins onto the water.
|
| 97328172 | about 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If the path was in the wrong place, (as per your comment above), could you say why you deleted it rather moving it to the correct position and amending the tags? Thanks. Regards Bernard. |