Hi, I'm sorry but it's not rendered properly on osminedit. It renders with the steps greyed out on levels 0,1 and 2. It needs to be mapped with all 3 levels of steps drawn and then each line of steps joining to one path level, rising up to join the above path level at the other end. The differing path levels must not be joined but be a separate way directly on top of (or under) the other ways. The map is rendered from birds eye view. As it is now if you can imagine tilting the building all the ways will be joined together. It should be drawn such that when imagining a tilted building, the paths are all separate with the steps going from one level of path to another level of path.

I hope that makes sense. Regards Bernard.

Hi. It looks like you've got both lines of steps joined at each end to paths at level 0, 1 and two. Can you really go up one flight of steps onto paths on 3 separate levels? Doesn't seem logical.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution to OSM
Most of the info you added was alreaddy tagged on the school amenity overall outline as per OSM practice. I've added your new info to the amenity outline. Thus the info on the building outline is duplication so I've removed it.

Regards & Happy Mapping Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You actually drew another building atop of the existing long building making a duplication. Going on your changeset comment I've divided the long building into six and inserted your new building at the end.
Hope thats OK Regards Bernard.

Hi, For me it will always be Boadicea, that's what I was taught at school. That was a long time ago though and it seems historians have now changed their minds but still don't agree on the actual spelling. The Lost Byway website calls it Boudicca’s Obelisk so I'd agree with that name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The reservoir is already mapped and tagged in the polygon Way: 461536475

Your POI name would actually be a description anyway. I placed the operator and tag on the polygon then removed the POI as it's duplication of data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi. Are you sure you've now spelt it correctly, whatever your preference I think there should be a 'u' in there.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you're quite right and I've no idea how I managed that. Amenity and date tags are removed from both paths.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

So is this actually a recycling container? If not then it ought be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi. I doubt if the bridge is formally "bridge" so I've removed it. Also the node you added joined the footway to the stream, this would be called a ford but I doubt if this is what you intended. I've removed the joining node, sectioned the footway to provide a section spanning the stream. This spanning section has tags added of bridge=yes
layer=1.

I hope this helps and shows how to map a bridge.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Yes the building is the super market and the building outline is tagged as such with other relevant data. Thus your new POI is duplication of data, so I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just wanted to let you know Way: 871356746 is a strange shape. Way: 295505731 looks like hedge or woods rather than industrial. These two ways are joining/overlapping paths and areas as well.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Actually White Farm Lane and School Lane are private roads, access=private indicates that the road is not to be used by the general public. Although services and visitors use the roads there is no stated permissive access. There is designated access on foot on School Lane an on White Farm Lane as far as School Lane. There is informal access (which could be termed permissive) from school Lane east on White Farm Lane to a footpath linking to Henby Way.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to say pretty good mapping. Also to mention that some tags are implied by their absence, covered=no and oneway=no are examples that are not usually needed as when absent they are implied.

I squared up the buildings in your other changesets and tweaked Paverly Court areas.

I hope this is OK, Regards Bernard.

Hi, OK. I don't use Facebook maps but I know it utilises/uses OpenStreetMap maps. I think Facebook intended to say you can report something wrong with the map here by adding a note to the map rather than a comment.

A comment is a directed at a particular edit/contribution asking that contributor to please have a look at a possible anomaly.

A note is a flag/pointer placed on the map asking if someone, (anyone who might be able to help) could look at a problem at the flag position. The facility to place a note is on the right side of this page, second box up. Click the box, accurately position the pointer, write in the text box what the problem is. It's important to place the flag accurately and describe the problem so someone else can understand it. The note stays until someone resolves it.

So I'll help if I can. Can you say what the problem is and where it is? You can place a note, (as described above) and then post the link to the note here. I'll be notified of the comments on this page here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
If you've verified on the ground that this now officially a cycleway then the tag proposed:highway=cycleway can be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've made a few amendments to your mapping to suit OSM practices. Addresses, areas and road connections.

Regards Bernard.

Oh, are you saying Facebook is wrong? If so it's nothing to do with this OpenStreetMap site.

Hello Layny68,
I'm sorry I don't understand what you're saying, could you explain further please? These edits are nothing to do with Bristol or Maldon.
Regards Bernard.

Hello kreuzschnabel,
The area Edge End Moor was tagged as heath but is wholly within the heath multipolygon Relation: 3203037. So being a duplication of the already tagged heath area I tagged it as farmland. (On reflection it might be better described as landuse=meadow.)

So Edge End Moor area is within an area tagged as heath, I've changed the farmland to meadow and added natural=moor.

Regards Bernard.