Glad to help, looks real good well done.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out this wiki page:- leisure=golf_course, it shows OSM practice for tagging a golf course.

Surface=grass is the correct tag, tagging landuse=grass is duplication and anyway the land is not used for growing grass it's for playing golf.

I can't figure out why you are making lots of relations, especially when the relation types are not tagged, please see here:- osm.wiki/Relation for relation types. There's not even a need for the overall multipolygon.

May I respectfully suggest you look at how a few other golf courses have been tagged.

If you need any help please just ask, Regards Bernard.

Hi IpswichMapper, I was not aware of the OSMCha ability to interact with review requests. It seems a bit convoluted and time consuming. Just another layer of interaction atop of what I do. What I do is look at the first few edits of all new contributors in a fairly wide area from me, irrespective of review request. Then immediately correct anything disruptive or fictional, offer help and/or advice. Interact with any problems to help the new folk learn. If there's no response I look again at the contributions in a week or so and correct anomalies.

After about forty years tramping the countryside, being told countless times that there has never been a path over or around the field I'm on. Perusing many maps in the course of walking and defending Public Rights of Way, as well as ten years of OSM contributing. I don't think I've ever seen a path or track in each of two side by side fields. There are cases where OS or County Councils have marked a path or track actually on a field boundary but these turn out to be incorrect. County Councils have drawn paths atop of field boundary's but when the definitive statement (which is the legal document), is read the true position of the way is found, (in one field or the other). In dealing with PRoW matters for many years it it has always been stated by legal folk that where there is a hedge or tree line the center of that feature is the dividing line between fields. This line then determine where a path is situated and where the path width is measured from, (hedge or tree center).

Your consideration that multiple ways when joined up are difficult to untangle is correct and at times very time consuming, especially when multipolygons are involved. Very frustrating when this is usually incorrect mapping. A big problem as lots of folk don't draw field boundary's to the hedge lines or leave gaps at hedge lines. It's OK to draw a hedge on a field boundary as that's usually where it's located.

Regards Bernard.
Sorry for the length of this explanation, I get carried away when talking about footpaths.

Hi, This changeset is now reverted, two conflicts of oneway tag resolved OK.
There were to many sections of highway with differing relation sections to just revert the duplication.

My revert changeset #92682100 (if it needs rolling back).

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Please be aware that there is now a duplication of a section of the A4 road. Placing one highway atop another is not combining a highway it's duplication. Further with several nodes joined together and combining 9 sections (each way), of route relation sections this makes for seriously interrupted if not impossible routeing.

Could you please look to remedy this?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I guess this is a test to see how OSM works. There's no park at this location it's a house. If you were trying to add your house and need help please just ask in the comments here.
I've removed the park POI.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The area's you've drawn, Way: Waterworks (413142201), Way: Waterworks (308627227), Way: Waterworks (306774401) these are not waterworks it's a man_made=wastewater_plant. It's also incorrect to use a description as a name. Names must be formal and verifiable to all. There seem to be several instances of these problems.

Your area Way: 860178626 is not a man_made=wastewater it's an area of three agricultural reservoirs.

The areas you've amended, Way: 365506071, Way: 365506070 tagged are drawn over several differing land features and tagged as fixme. If you can't fix them please don't try to fix them. The original mapper has drawn hundreds of areas like this, they all could do with fixing properly.

I notice your large areas tagged landuse=farmland (like Way: 860178639), actually encompass areas that are comprised of many different landuses, some drawn and tagged as various types of farmland. Way: 860178639 (landuse=farmland) has inside it woods, buildings, orchards and ponds.

Way: 860178636, a large area covering differing types of landuse is untagged.

Could you have a look at these anomalies please, Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That name seems to be a description so I've tagged it as such, (name tag is for proper formal verifiable names). I've also changed the highway to service as it seems to be such a highway. The tag access=private suffices to describe all access, so the other private tags are not needed, they're not actually incorrect but they just serve to bloat the database.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Could you please be careful not to make duplicate sections of highway, (placing highway atop of highway). I've just corrected five in the Lynn area.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Chris, Much appreciate you taking the comment in such a friendly way, some folk get a bit upset no matter how polite you try to be.

All looks good now, Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've somehow dragged the two grass areas and churchyard out of alignment. I didn't fix it so you could see what's happened. Could you look to correct it please? Any problem let me know on the comments here and I'll fix it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, some of your wood areas are mapped around shadows and the large tree crowns.
Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the name and landuse tags to proposed:? As the feature is in the proposed stage and thus not verifiable, (other OSM contributors might consider even this as not to OSM practice). Your tags stated the area was in commercial use and had a formal name. When/if the proposal work is started the area can be tagged as construction which is verifiable.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've unjoined the path from the private road at north and south. Then joined footpath 10 where it crosses the private road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Is this a second set of toilets? The reason I ask is that Hurley Lock Toilet and Waste Disposal is mapped just fifty feet away.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A name only is not enough data for OSM to properly utilise and to have render on a map. Your web link was only to an image not a website, a description is not rendered on a map. Lastly the POI was joined to the highway center line, all-right for a street party but baking cakes?

I found your company details and have amended the POI data to that needed in OSM. I unjoined the POI from the highway. I don't know what house is number 5 so I've drawn the houses each side of the street near the POI position. Perhaps you could place the POI correctly over your building or put the tags on the building outline. If you need any help please just ask in the comment section here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for adding the Stagsike Trail to OSM.
However being relatively new to OSM you've made inadvertent mistakes. The new paths being drawn atop of existing highways duplication of the highway. You hadn't joined up the new ways properly anyway, (leaving gaps and overlaps). I've redrawn the trail by sectioning up the existing highways which make up the trail. Tagging them with the trail name and where appropriate adding foot=yes. Then I've removed all the duplications.

If the Stagsike Trail is a recognised signed trail you might want to consider adding a route relation to OSM. This would tie all the different parts of the trail together. I don't think adding relations is easy, if at all possible with GoMap. Is it a recognised trail, signed, is there a website, any trail information? If so I could add the route relation.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Darren, I found the website with the floors of the building. One way to map this would be to draw the whole Quadrangle as the main building, tag such. Draw the four buildings as building:part=apartments, name=?, levels=?, please see:-building:part=*. Also if possible map the entrances to each building part.

Each building part can have the individual address tags, with numbers of the apartments if possible. Alternatively a method sometimes used is to map the entrances and place the address tags on the entrance node.

I don't know how easy this all is with the iD editor but it's fairly easy with the JOSM editor. If you need any help please just ask? I may have a go at it later on if you don't want to.

Regards Bernard

Hi Andrew, Glad to assist, if you need help please just ask. There are several forums for mappers, you can message another mapper by clicking their name then send message.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You inadvertently dragged part of Peckham Rye and the cycleway onto Scylla Road, I've corrected this back to original position.

I added a website for the bunker. I gather the bunker is underground so I've unjoined it from the roads and tagged as layer=-1, indicating below ground, (does it actually extend under the roads?). I changed industrial to brownfield as I think the land has yet to be developed, added historic yes amended name and description tags as per website information.

Regards Bernard.